Monster Rancher the Great
I can't quite remember the guy who reviewed my unblock, but thank you for taking the time to do it. I understand completely, but I would like to say that I also disagree completely. I would just like to say that I'm sorry, and that I hope that one day this block does expire, even though I know it won't. Therefore, I would like to say goodbye, and I know that what I have done is wrong. So, I guess that's it.
Play Monster Rancher! (talk)(not so great anymore).
Oh, and one more thing. Since no one will be using this page anymore, can someone speedy delete my user page? It wouldn't make sense to keep it, as no one is using the account anymore.
Monster Rancher the Great (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
(cut and pasted text from below, don't know if user knows to use unblock Syrthiss (talk) 16:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)) Look, I really am sorry about what I did as Maxwell Derwinee, but I haven't done one bad thing (intentionally) as Monster Rancher the Great. I realize this may not help much, but I have done good as me, and you have not seen one vandalism from me. Please unblock me. You have seen what I do as this user, and it's harmless. If you won't, I completely understand. If anybody comes to this page and says no, then I thank you for what you've done on Wikipedia. And, if this block does ever expire, I will not post, because I don't want to do any harm. Thank you all.
Probably my final signature, Play Monster Rancher! (talk).
Decline reason:
This account is not what's blocked; the person using it -- you -- is blocked, under any and all names. Wikipedia is not a role-playing game. --jpgordon::==( o ) 18:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Monster Rancher the Great (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
See my computer's page which I got unblocked, User Talk:74.111.171.12 for the reason for my requested unblock. I was unblocked there, and therefore, I think I should be unblocked here. Thank you.
Decline reason:
It wasn't unblocked; the block there just expired. But thank you for letting us know that's your IP. Saves us the Checkuser. Daniel Case (talk) 07:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Since you've used your time since this last unblock to continue to rant against wikipedia, and now to say you're hurt by something that another user has on their talkpage (where I see no mention of you on their talkpage aside from the talkback to here), I'm going to remove your ability to edit this page. Syrthiss (talk) 11:30, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
@Syrthiss: This is Monster Rancher the Great, and I would only like to point out (not to change anything) that Parent 5446 did in fact make remarks about me, which I found offensive, on his talk page. I'm not saying this to offend or upset you or anyone else, but I just wanted you to know. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.111.171.12 (talk) 18:33, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Monster Rancher the Great (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Huh...okay. I'm gonna give this one last try. All I really want is a fresh start on Wikipedia; that's all I'm asking for. I've said it over and over. I made stupid edits in the past and deserved to be blocked. So, I created a new account, for a fresh start; I didn't know that was against policy. Then, when I was discovered, I read most of the policies, if not all of them. So now, here I am, a Wikipedian who wants to help, but can't because I'm blocked. Also, if my memory serves me correct, the blocking policy states that a block is not a "do the crime, do the time," thing. It's to get people to read and understand the policies, correct? Well, I've done so and I've realized the error in my ways, and I can't think of one more reason why I'm still blocked, other than as a punishment. So, that's it. Somebody, please reply, and if I'm not unblocked, I'd at the very least like to know why I can't be. Thank you.74.111.171.12 (talk) 04:29, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I was going to offer a second chance, but then I noticed that you've already been evading other blocks with this and other accounts, and you still thought it would be ok to blatantly evade your block with this IP address. No. Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:03, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
OK. I get it. Thanks. Anyways, I only did it because I want to help Wikipedia...but I still violated policy. I get it. Thanks, 74.111.171.12 (talk) 04:12, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
The article Korra (The Legend of Korra) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article is entirely plot summary. Not only is there very little out-of-universe information in the article itself, but there is very little out-of-universe info in existence to begin with (and all of it is in the article already). The only relevant non-plot info is two sentence-long quotes from the show's creators, one describing how they created the character and one describing her personality. Unless I'm missing something, this article should be deleted until the show has developed more and more sources exist to warrant a separate article.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Parent5446 ☯ (msg email) 16:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC)