Monkeyinaspasm

License tagging for Image:New coat of arms.png

Thanks for uploading Image:New coat of arms.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:09, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Gwydianthia is nominated as an article for deletion

Sorry, but I do not feel that Gwydianthia is noteworthy enough for inclusion at this time. There are no references. There are no other sources. And exactly who is Richard Gill? Risker 06:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Pulse_logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Pulse_logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Web logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Web logo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Royal_Coat_of_Arms.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Royal_Coat_of_Arms.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 09:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Article-1200883-05C6E1B8000005DC-445 468x698.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Article-1200883-05C6E1B8000005DC-445 468x698.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kwekubo (talk) 13:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Deutschland sucht den Superstar

Hi, - by a chance i dropped into the artcle on the Germany version of "Pop Idol" and/or "Amercan Idol", respectively. (Deutschland sucht den Superstar) where I found some of your edits. That's why I address myself to you now.

I have a problem correcting the Info box; - I don't know why, but my edits don't get added. Could you, or anyone else reading this, please replace the following terms/words:

“broadcasting station” instead of “network”

„televised“ instead of „filmed“

“hosted by” or “hosts” instead of “starring”

To be honest: in form and content the entire article is poorly written to such an exent that a complete revsion would be strongly recommended. In addition it's often pepped up with cheap tabloid material and totally negligible and insignifact fan stuff (also taken from various websites and homepages).

BUT: - the whole subject, especially most of the contestants, listed up there, and even credited by own paragraphs (most of them fell into oblivion again quite immediately after the end of the seasons in question or - even worse - after their own leaving/voting out), is unimportant in such a manner, that I don't have any ambition to "rewrite" the article.

According to the orthography and the diletant use/translations of German terms and words (in my perception), I asssume that it's written by a German teenager of, at the best, high school age.

Regards--Bylot (talk) 13:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Mainstage icon.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mainstage icon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 04:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pulse logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pulse logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 12:57, 13 March 2010 (UTC)