Molodo456

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Amazing Facts appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. You might feel a certain way about the subject of the article or about members of the organization, but it's improper to label them without citing references and in a biased way. Wikipelli ^Talk 13:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Amazing Facts

I saw the changes that you made and I went in and softened them a bit. To say that someone has a 'bias' against something carries a negative connotation. You might view it as negative, as many might, but you have to remember that the encyclopedia should always have a 'neutral' point of view. It must be left for the reader to make up their own mind about how they view the information. I think it's better to say, factually, that he has spoken against the ordination of women than to put a value judgement on it.

Having said that, I'm not altogether sure that the information should or will stay in the article. That can be decided by those who have more of a vested interest in the subject than I do. If there's controversy or argument over your additions to the article, use the talk page for the article to present your views and read the views of others that might oppose them. Come to a consensus on what information should be presented in the article. I hope this is helpful. :) My goal is to soften the rhetoric just a little so you don't start off in a heated argument! Let me know if you have any questions or problems! Cheers... Wikipelli ^Talk 14:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)