Mofs

Middlesbrough F.C. FAC proposal

Hi, you have proposed this article for WP:FAC but have not completed all the steps in the nomination. Please visit WP:FAC and complete the remaining steps of the nomination process. Thanks Keith D (talk) 11:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Middlesbrough F.C. Peer Review

No worries for the review. The main thing I can notice still to touch up is the introductory phrases e.g. "In 1905", "By 1974", "In April 1986", that will need a comma between them and the next part of the sentence. You'll need to do this if you want to push it to FAC. Peanut4 (talk) 19:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Middlesbroughprogramme.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Middlesbroughprogramme.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

The possessive apostrophe

Hi. Just a minor point on the use of the possessive apostrophe, following your edit to the Martin Whitmarsh article. Where a noun (including most proper nouns) is singular yet ends with a sibilant (usually -s) classical grammar still requires you to append a second s following the possessive apostrophe. The only occasion where it is incorrect to do so are those proper names that appear in the bible, and where the form of the noun makes the double sibilant difficult to say. As you would pronounce Ron's form "dennis-es" it clearly can take the second s. Take a look at this article for a fuller discussion. A very minor point, but as you were "correcting" another user's perfectly correct grammar I thought it worth mentioning. Pyrope 20:26, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Beware of false accusation

Hi Mofs, please be careful of false accusation such as your edit here where you reverted a removal of an invalid image with a clear edit summary as 'vandalism'. I was very dubious of the edits by 82.29.207.3 as being valid but wasn't sure if it was vandalism, so just removed the invalid image added. Regards 22:54, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

• Hi, Mofs - Thanks for the message. I had assumed it was just a simple mistake, glad to hear it was, we all make them. Thought I's respond here as well so anyone seeing this page would know it was just a simple mistake and everything's good. All the Best. KylieTastic (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mofs. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mofs. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mofs. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)