Moderato6th

Welcome!

Hello, Moderato6th, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Brian the Editor (talk) 19:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

School rankings

Your recent editing history at University of Virginia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Brian the Editor (talk) 19:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

I've posted the same edit war/3RR notice on the talk pages for the anonymous users who seem to be the other participants in this dispute. 1995hoo (talk) 19:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

A question

Moderato6th, it appears to me that your interpretation of WP:UNIGUIDE to prohibit all references to rankings in the lede may be incorrect in part. UNIGUDE provides for limited use of the rankings in the lede:

In the lead, do not use rankings to synthesize an image of the institution, whether good or bad. Give one factual statement summarising overall "most recent" rankings obtained in key surveys (for example, "In 2010, institution 'A' has been ranked #3 by The Economist, #5 by The New York Times and #8 by Financial Times."). In the lead, do not give the sub factor rankings obtained in each survey (for example, details like "ranked #x in placements" or "ranked #3 in research" should not be given in lead at all).

Based on the foregoing, would you consider modifying your expressed position? --Arxiloxos (talk) 20:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Request for Response on University of Virginia Talk Page

Moderato6th, a couple of responses to your interpretation of the WP:UNIGUIDE have been posted in Talk:University of Virginia page, including:

The editors who removed the rankings did so because they said it was prohibited by the WP:College and university article guidelines and its supplemental essay: WP:Avoid academic boosterism#Avoid undue weight. I've looked at those sections and can't find anything that "clearly states that there should be no rank mentioning in lead." All that those pages say is to avoid presenting such information with undue weight. Also, the University of California, Riverside page made it through a featured article review with rankings described in the lead section, which is further evidence that this is not against any rules. Brian the Editor (talk) 22:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

If you would be so kind as to respond, it would appreciated, so that we can resolve this debate. Pacnorth2013 (talk) 02:33, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Alfie+Allen+Sky+Atlantic+Launch+Arrivals+dwh61QjZ5scl.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Alfie+Allen+Sky+Atlantic+Launch+Arrivals+dwh61QjZ5scl.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:06, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012

Your addition to File:Alfie+Allen+Sky+Atlantic+Launch+Arrivals+dwh61QjZ5scl.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:16, 6 April 2012 (UTC)