User talk:MissSammy79/sandbox

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 15lschriever in topic Luke's Peer review

we are working on creating a page entitled public criminologyMissSammy79 (talk) 23:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

You guys are doing great! keep up the good work within your group! I left some comments on your user page15lschriever (talk) 13:37, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

I decided to evaluate the page white collar crime.I thought the information was laid out well and easy to follow. The list of the longest sentences for these made me angry. Richard Marin Scrushy got 7 years for $2,800,000,000 in losses where we have people who got caught with marijuana getting more than that. There are a few specifics I thought would be good to add. I did not see anything for extortion which is also a section of white collar crime. I found this list on the FBI website. Health care fraud Human trafficking International and domestic public corruption Narcotics trafficking Terrorism This list is also from the FBI website and talks about ways money is laundered. Financial institutions International trade Precious metals Real estate Third party service providers Virtual currency There are some statistics from the website https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=33 which is the Bureau of Justice Statistics that could be helpful as well for this page. The main question I have is why do most of these criminals get lower sentences if they are fully prosecuted as well. Are there reliable statistics for this? There is so much more information that could be added. The page appears to be neutral and the references look good. MissSammy79 (talk) 02:24, 14 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Luke's Peer review edit

You guys have a great working piece for the article going on here. My only worry is that it shadows if not coincides with the background group. Both groups should get together to discuss the differences and similarities so that there is no overlap or repetitiveness in the article. Other than this, great job keeping the ball rolling and you guys are doing great! The structure is very well so too is the organization. Good job keeping the content neutral and not one sided! That is harder to do than most people think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 15lschriever (talkcontribs) 13:42, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply