Welcome

edit

Hello Mirkhwand and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Mubarak Ali Gilani, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Xzinger (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

February 2019

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mubarak Ali Gilani. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Xzinger (talk) 13:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:10, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Once the block is over you may try to discuss on the talk page. Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:34, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
The page is protected and you can please discuss. Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:54, 20 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

May 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Star Mississippi. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mubarak Ali Gilani without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please stop removing sourced information. You're welcome to discuss it on the Talk page but you may not edit war. Star Mississippi 15:46, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply