Hello Miri Rozenberg, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! dave souza, talk 18:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Regarding edits to George Vithoulkas edit

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Miri Rozenberg! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bexample\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 11:49, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

3RR on George Vithoulkas edit

 
Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Skinwalker 15:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

George Vithoulkas and conventional medicine edit

In his speech in Sweden:[1], George Vithoulkas makes a series of comments which he summarises as "conventional medicine, instead of curing diseases, is actually the cause of the degeneration of the human race." This seems a pretty clear, and I found no suggestion in his speech of the point highlighted in the overview presented by the British Homeopathic Association that "Homeopathy integrates well with conventional medicine." At the AfD discussion, you commented "With impressions, even innocent people have been killed. What counts, are facts." I'm concerned that people could be harmed if they are confused into refusing or stopping necessary medical treatments, and would welcome the facts about the true position taken taken by George Vithoulkas on conventional medicine which, to appear in Wikipedia, must be cited from an attributable reliable source. Your assistance in obtaining citable facts clarifying this point will be most appreciated. .. dave souza, talk 19:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dave Souza I looked at Vithoulkas' website and I found a citation in which you can see that Vithoulkas doesn't recommend allopatic medications to be stopped. You can see at his interview in Securvital, the biggest german journal of insurance companies [[2]] Also, I give you the question and the answer of the interview that we are interested in:

P. Which are the possibilities of homeopathic treatment in very advanced pathological cases?
In this group we have end-stages of diseases, like cancer, liver cirrhosis, juvenile diabetes, long standing diabetes that need insulin, long standing Parkinson, neuromuscular diseases, amyatrophic lateral sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, myopathy, myasthenia, brain strokes, spastic and autistic children, long standing epilepsy, long standing asthma with emphysema, serious heart conditions, serious mental disorders like schizophrenia, homeopathy can offer very little help in very few of such cases. There are few successes in such cases that made some over-enthusiastic homeopaths to believe or to claim that homeopathy can intervene and cure everything. The truth of the matter is that for such cases we have success only in a few cases. For these groups of diseases the practitioner will need the chemical drugs of conventional medicine in order to control the situation. An Objective Homeopath Miri Rozenberg 12:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that information. [[User:Abridged|Abridged] has already copied this to Talk:George Vithoulkas#George Vithoulkas --- opinions on the role of conventional medicine in patient care (moved from AFD talk page), and the discussion should continue there. Your assistance with this is greatly appreciated, dave souza, talk 13:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Invitation edit

 

You are invited to join the Homeopathy WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Homeopathy. Please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Don't delay---the first 25 members will receive this beautfiul toaster   !!!

Abridged talk 14:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply