Hi, and welcome. I tidied up your addition to lifting body (mainly by removing your name - we don't sign in articles themselves). By the way, perhaps that content would better fit into X-24 since lifting body seems to be a generic term.
However, your edit to Instructional technology seemed to be particularly POV (slang around here for "personal opinions"). While this sort of thing can be included if attributed to a source (e.g. "Professor X of Y university believes that IT is neglected in schools... etc") it's best to avoid (and in fact, Wikipedia policy forbids) giving personal opinions as if they're absolutely true.
As for logic, I thought your edit was meandering and vague, dealing with too many subjects at once. Sorry. Actually, having said that, it could probably fit quite well into Aristotelian logic itself, I'll add it there.
Finally, do you have a source for the Air Engine Hybrid? It seems a plausible idea, but if it's just your own idea then again it's dodgy, I'm afraid.
Evercat 20:26 25 Jul 2003 (UTC)
I am sorry if I seemed to be picking on you there. I seem to be picking up a habit of treading on people's toes around here. Please forgive me. Evercat 23:05 26 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Start a discussion with MikeS
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with MikeS. What you say here will be public for others to see.
