MikeRumex
Ways to improve James' space edit
Hi, I'm Xcia0069. MikeRumex, thanks for creating James' space!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Just a bit of context at the start of this article might make it clearer for non-experts
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Xcia0069 (talk) 12:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Two other issues:
- "In functional analysis" does not suffice for context setting because it fails to tell the lay reader that mathematics rather then architecture, Freudian psychology, interior decorating, etc., is what it's about. I've rephrased it.
- The word "functional" should have a lower-case initial "f" when it's in the middle of a sentence. I changed that too.
- Michael Hardy (talk) 20:37, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- Two other issues:
Disambiguation link notification for November 25 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James' space, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reflexive. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Mathole Motshekga: Misplaced footnotes/unclear sources edit
I've noted some inadequacies in your documentation on the Mathole Motshekga page on its talk page, here. Can you make the attributions more precise? Thanks in advance! --Haruo (talk) 00:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!