February 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Microsoft Research has been identified as vandalism and reverted by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Microsoft Research", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it gives the impression the account is shared - see WP:NOSHARE. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. K6ka (talk | contribs) 23:31, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Username

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Microsoft Research", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website which relates to the entity in question, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or accounts that are shared. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our Conflict of interest guideline and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. NTox · talk 01:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.  You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 12:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Microsoft Research (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Microsft Research is the legitimate user for editing the Microsoft Research page content. If you will note the revisions you will see it is not spam but rather typical content updates. Please unblock the Microsoft Research account. Thank you. Microsoft Research (talk) 00:17, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

As the block notice says quite explicitly, we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website. --jpgordon::==( o ) 05:37, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.