taken from User:Prophet15's page. ~~Patrick~~ 20:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

GameFAQs

edit

Please refrain from making edits like this. -- Steel 15:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have something similar to say. look at this for another notable example. Thank you. Iceberg2229 (talk) 23:02, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Lamb slaughter

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Lamb slaughter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Pigman 17:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:Satanic Rites.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Satanic Rites.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:12, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

edit

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 15:09, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

March 2008

edit
  • Please try to maintain a neutral point of view in regards to Wikipedia articles, and remember that the talk pages aren't places for promoting unsourced claims and opinions. If you have a reliable, verifiable, and unbiased source of information that would supplement your claim about Jesus being made up by the Romans by all means include it, but as the current historical section does contain such sources there is very little reason to delete it. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask. Peter Deer (talk) 21:32, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
    • See there that is an assertion and you do not really have any verifiable sources to support your claim. If you do, then you should be bold and cite them. However, I think I should say I can see no logic behind your assertion. On what grounds do you advance the claim that the Romans made up Jesus, and what motivation would the romans have had for doing so?
      Furthermore, what *can* be historically discerned is that Christianity was illegal in the roman empire until the fourth century, and there is significant evidence that the Romans tried to erase Christianity and make it seem as if Christ never existed. Why would they go to all the work of falsifying a religion only to persecute and kill its members and try and make it look as if the religion never existed?
      On an unrelated note, you can automatically sign talk pages using four tildes. (like this: ~~~~)The tilde on most keyboards is in the left hand corner right before the 1 key and right below the esc. key.
      I can understand feeling quite sure of one thing and wanting to just enter it into wikipedia as fact but in order to be somewhat accurate that's not how wikipedia works. I suggest you spend a little time looking through WP:getting_started. I would be glad if you decided to look through it and become a full-time constructive editor, because it's a short trip otherwise. Peter Deer (talk) 17:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
    • I fail to see your logic. That Christianity, which began in the small Jewish community in Judea, after several centuries became widely accepted throughout the Roman Empire is hardly indicative of the Romans inventing Christ. As I mentioned before, early Rome not only outlawed the practice but had a tendency to execute its adherents. But as I have said before, if you have a reliable, verifiable, and neutral source of information that is indicative of your point, then you can edit the article as long as you cite the sources.

      As to getting started in Wikipedia, there's actually a whole section at WP:Getting started <----(click that) that can help you. If you are lost, I can help you out on more specific things, though I must say I am not very advanced as far as formatting, but I do know where you can find all the information you would need. Peter Deer (talk) 22:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please read this

edit
DKLOK This user likes coffee.

Real coffee from the hills of Columbia.