Mediaperson2016
May 2016
edit
Hello. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Stephen Andrew without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JWNoctistalk 10:49, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Stephen Andrew with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Omni Flames let's talk about it 10:56, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen Andrew, you may be blocked from editing. The cited source indicates that Stephen Andrew was working as a "public relations consultant" for South Island Resource Management. If you have reiable sources which contradict that, then please provide those sources, and explain why you believe they mean that the relevant content should be removed from the article. The mere fact that someone who chooses to create a Wikipedia account says that it isn't true is not a reliable source. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2016 (UTC)