User talk:Medeis/Archive 1

Behave yourselves

It is not my desire to enter into personal disputes. What matters to me are facts and objective criteria, not personalities and third party opinions of the motives of others.

That being said, this is my talk page.

Under no circumstances should any third parties talk it upon themselves to remove another contributor's comments from this page. If you believe a contributor to this page is a blocked user, report that suspicion to the appropriate authority. Do not vandalize this page based upon your suspicions or opinions, no matter how strong.

I regard deletions of comments by third parties as vandalism and will report further incidents of it as such. μηδείς (talk) 15:58, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Problem with Ckatz

As you must have seen the following message was put on John_Searle talk page and it was removed immediately by Ckatz

You might be interested in seeing how every discussion is personalized by this rogue administrator Ckatz [1].

- 117.254.21.154 (talk) 05:58, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

::You might also see [2], at [3] and [4]. She never gives up. Not only that she makes up all sort of stories and lies to justify her sorry behavior. Since yesterday she is using an IP address as a sockpuppet [5].  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.254.176.97 (talk) 08:37, 29 May 2010 (UTC)   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.254.24.21 (talk)  

I repeat, behave yourselves

It is not my desire to enter into personal disputes. What matter to me are facts and objective criteria, not personalities and third party opinions of the motives of others.

That being said, this is my talk page.

Under no circumstances should any third parties talk it upon themselves to remove another contributor's comments from this page. If you believe a contributor to this page is a blocked user, report that suspicion to the appropriate authority. Do not vandalize this page based upon your suspicions or opinions, no matter how strong.

I regard deletions of comments by third parties as vandalism and will report further incidents of it as such. μηδείς (talk) 15:58, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

No disrespect is intended to your talk page; however, the IP is a sock of a banned user, and their postings constitute a breach of their block. Blocked users are (per Wikipedia rules) not permitted to use sockpuppets to evade their blocks, and the authority to report these breaches to would be an administrator (such as myself). Unfortunately, these actions are par for the course for this individual (Akraj, and you're receiving them because he perceives you as a potential supporter. --Ckatz^chat_spy 16:34, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

It strikes me as inappropriate and a conflict of interest that you are acting in the capacity of victim, judge, and policeman here, Ckatz. I am quite happy to assume for the sake of argument that the IP poster above is the said blocked user. I am sure there are appropriate ways for you to take that up elsewhere. Given that that user did not vandalize my page or engage in any behavior such as obscenity, his comments to my talk page amount at best to a technical misdemeanor. Your deleting those comments on nothing more than your own personal judgment, when you yourself are a subject of those comments, amounts to a personal conflict of interest as well as an abuse of power as an administrator. You cannot claim to be acting as an impartial administrator. If his crime is a misdemeanor yours is an abuse of office, in effect a civil rights violation to make an analogy with US Constitutional law. Consider the actions of the police in the Rodney King beating. The police viewed themselves as having been wronged and disrespected by Mr. King. They judged him as guilty, and they meted out summary punishment. Regardless of the fact that Mr. King was speeding and under the influence, their crime was much the worse.

I suggest that since you are a party to this apparent dispute that you refer the matter to disinterested arbiters, and let them act as is determined to be appropriate, rather than take it upon yourself to be plaintiff, judge and executioner in the same matter.

I ask that no party respond further on this matter here. This is not a forum upon which to conduct personal disputes. My actions are not in question. If you must, place a comment in response on your own user page, just as I have.

I will regard continuation of this personal dispute here as harassment and reserve the right to report it as such.μηδείς (talk) 17:09, 29 May 2010 (UTC)