User talk:Mdiana294/sandbox

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Mdiana294
  • In signs and symptoms, instead of describing the epididymis maybe you can just link to the wiki page for epididymis
  • Since this is usually caused by trauma or after a complication of surgery, it can happen to any male. But is there an age range that experiences worsen symptoms?
  • When doing a blood test (really any of the diagnostic tests) what is specifically being looked for?
  • I like how you wrote when it was important to seek emergency medical care

Desireeaustin (talk) 03:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • There should be a small description that talks about causes and how the list of disorders possible causes this disease.
  • The diagnosis section should explain what is looked for when the test are done.

- I linked the tests and only discussed the tests essential for diagnosis. --Mdiana294 (talk) 04:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • I think the information that is given is very complex for someone with no medical background could understand.
  • Overall I like how your page is structured and the information that has been provided is very informative.

--Desarayjackson (talk) 19:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Your lead could use more information.
  • Cite each section, and each paragraph within a section.

was not able to cite the Scrotal section; Originally there before already.Although, I cited the rest of my sections. --Mdiana294 (talk) 04:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • There is more mechanism you could write about the condition itself, even if the causes are complicated. You could also give some of the common connections and explain how they happen.
  • Some terminology could be simplified or better defined and linked.
  • What sorts of blood tests? What are they looking for?
  • Guidance on doing the self-exam does not belong in this article.
  • Nothing you have listed under epidemiology actually belongs in this section.
  • Yes, most (although not all) of the recent research is case reports. You still need to talk about the major findings.

--Sweiner02 (talk) 17:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • You did a great job listing the sign and symptoms of this disease. These are rare diseases and I feel like you found a lot of useful information.
  • I believe the introduction lacks the depth that all of the other sections have. I feel like it should be longer than 1 sentence.
  • I think your prevention section is very strong, going into a lot of detail. I think some of this detail could be used to make the intro stronger.
  • I believe some of the things that you put in the prognosis could be presented in the signs and symptoms category.

Bobby896 (talk) 19:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply