User talk:Mboverload/AWB

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Silly rabbit in topic Bug in script

The spellcheck thing doesn't seem to be working for me. Whenever I load it, it always says "Invalid syntax in Line 10, position 110.--Ac1983fan (talkcontribs) 22:38, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Which version of AWB are you using? I'll check it myself, one sec. --mboverload@ 22:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
The latest version.--Ac1983fan (talkcontribs) 22:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Finished. Download it from the link I made. I should have know that cut and pasting it wouldn't work. Have fun =D --mboverload@ 22:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Isle of Wight

edit

Reverted your change. Wiht is correct in this context. Naturenet | Talk 10:29, 2 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Whoa, sorry. I strive for 100% error free, so I'll remove that word from my database. Thanks for telling me. --mboverload@ 10:46, 2 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Editing to expand templates?

edit

See this edit. You expanded the {{PAGENAME}} within the "subst:prod" template instantiation. That's probably not worth doing. --John Nagle 15:55, 2 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

It does it automatically, it's no bother. --mboverload@ 21:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

ignore if contains

edit

AWB ignores the html entities &#596 &#620 &#699 &#700 &#705 &#803 &#9408 &#9848 (and others of course) so there is no need to skip articles that contain these any more. thanks Martin 10:28, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

So I should be in the clear for all unicoding? =D --mboverload@ 11:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ukranian / Ukrainian

edit

Both are found at http://www.dictionary.com (Michael Ignatieff article) JiHymas@himivest.com 06:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Bug in script

edit

Hi, Your change to Derivative was wrong. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 23:44, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I recommend adjusting the script to avoid trying to make changes inside a < math > environment. Also, this is the second time I have reverted the same change. Is another user implementing the same script? siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 23:46, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I see you have done the same thing (here you did it the first time). Please be more careful. siℓℓy rabbit (talk) 13:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply