December 2007 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:Ponytail Ninja, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Spuck edit

 

A tag has been placed on Spuck, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. vlad§inger tlk 23:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

May 2008 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jim Crow laws. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rob Banzai (talk) 23:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Spuck edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Spuck, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Justpassin (talk) 00:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Spuck edit

 

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Spuck which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this page without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the page's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. --ZimZalaBim talk 00:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Apple. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. VMS Mosaic (talk) 23:14, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to India.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. JoJan (talk) 04:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply