MarketingStudent2004

June 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Apricot. Graham87 (talk) 18:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Please see my edit summary there. I'm curious who your internship is with (and any of their other current/previous students) and why you as a first-year university student have seemingly been encouraged to use citation hunt, which was originally primarily used by librarians, to do mass-edits here. Marketing (which is what you're studying) is basically an anathema to the neutral point of view policy on Wikipedia and your addition of a completely irrelevant blog as a citation to the Apricot page is highly suspicious (especially because blogs aren't reliable sources here), so I've reverted all your edits. Please do not continue your current editing pattern. Graham87 (talk) 18:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Artificial hair integrations, you may be blocked from editing. —Bruce1ee^talk 09:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

I am sorry:( MarketingStudent2004 (talk) 14:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 13:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

You have been unresponsive to concerns noted here. Graham87 (talk) 13:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)