Marasek

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

I also have some comments on your categorization effort. First, Wikipedia naming policy is to use plurals for most categories, and to use lower case outside of proper names, so that Category:Domesticated Plant would likely be better named Category:Domesticated plants. Second, I do not believe it is necessary to tag so many individual plants. Take, for example, the article Barley. It is already in Category:Cereals, which is a subcategory of Category:Food crops. By tagging the latter, you would cover many plants at once. This is probably not the end of the matter, since these higher level categories themselves are a mess right now, and if you could help to rationalize them, that would be a welcome contribution.

I hope these thoughts are helpful. Thank you and good luck. — Pekinensis 19:42, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Hmm...maybe I rushed into this. I wanted to replace List of domesticated plants by a category.Marasek 20:13, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

That seems like a good impulse. I've been thinking about our taxonomy of useful plants for some time, and have not come to any conclusions besides that our current system is neglected and unsatisfactory. I would like to see an intuitive, logical system that reflects several different ways that a user might approach the question.

I see several basic hierarchies, starting with phylogeny, use, plant-part, and domestication status. I am trying to reflect categories that are important in daily life, but the result so far is that some of these are ill-defined, or reflect a limited view of human culture, and certainly this list list is incomplete.

• Phylogeny is already well treated.
• Use:
  • Fiber
  • Medicine and recreation
  • Food
    • Flavoring
    • Macronutrients
      • Fat (i.e. nuts and oilseeds)
      • Protein (i.e. legumes)
      • Starch (i.e. cereals and starchy root vegetables)
    • Micronutrients
      • Main dish (i.e. vegetables)
      • Dessert (i.e. fruits)
• Plant part
  • Seed
  • Fruit
  • Leaves
  • Roots, tubers, corms, rhizomes, et cetera
  • Above-ground stems
• Domestication status
  • Domesticated
  • Wild

I'm not saying that these should be the categories, but I would like the categories to reflect them.

Figuring this all out seems like a big project, and I'm happy to let it stand for the moment.

— Pekinensis 20:55, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Hmm....I do not think that it is necessary to have such a fine grained system of categories. For instance, main dish and dessert seems to be far too cultural specific to me. Further, I will assume that a plant is wild if it is not domesticated.

As a user, I think I'd rather have a long list of domesticated plants. Then there are plants like flax, which are used for fibers and oil, or cannabis sativa, which is used for fibers and as drug.

In de.wikipedia the respective category is "Nutzpflanze" (usable plant, agricultural plant), which is a long list and has some subcategories. Honestly, I don't see the additional information/use that a category like "cereals" provide. Marasek 21:11, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Indeed, I don't see the use of any of these categories, but it is a compulsion.  :)

I think the issue of multiple-use plants is not an issue, because the category system should be a directed acyclic graph and not a tree.

I agree that the distinction between main dish and dessert is ill-defined and culture-specific, but it seems like a very important intuitive distinction for many people. Indeed, I note that the Chinese, Spanish, and German wikipedias all separate fruits from vegetables, separating okra, green beans, and eggplants on the one hand from peaches, grapes, and pineapples on the other.

I suppose I see a use for finer categories like "cereals" in expanding the reader's ideas by showing a list of possiblities they might not have thought of, without overwhelming them as might a wider category.

However my motivation for listing the hierarchies above was to try and pick apart the notions that current category system is trying to convey, as a step toward imagining a more self-consistent system. Certainly, drastically simplifying the system would be one way to achieve self-consistency.

I'm happy to be lazy for the moment, and let it all be.

— Pekinensis 21:59, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Marasek. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Marasek~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

01:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)