Welcome!

edit
 
Welcome!

Hello, ManoelWild, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 17:07, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2023

edit

This is wrong!

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ManoelWild (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is wrong! All I did was edit a new article about a publication in my country. I'm not anyone's puppet! ManoelWild (talk) 06:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. Yamla (talk) 10:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ManoelWild (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have constructively countered vandalism on Wikipedia and added important information from Krytyka Polityczna to a new article. I have done nothing wrong here, I'm not anyone's puppet. I am editing from Poland and that new article on the Polish publication caught my eye. ManoelWild (talk) 17:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This is still just a denial. 331dot (talk) 10:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ManoelWild (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The block imposed was not necessary to prevent damage or disruption and violates the Wikipedia Wikipedia:Blocking policy. I'm my own person and nobody's puppet. I've added meticulously researched information from a good Polish source to a new article. This is not the act of some malicious puppet, I am well meaning here. This is horribly wrong, why are you horrendously violating the Wikipedia blocking policy by blocking well meaning contributions? ManoelWild (talk) 13:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No response to below in over two months. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not reviewing this, but this is yet another denial. Every sock puppet denies being one, since that is the whole point. Many of them also make good edits. If there is an error here, you will need to do better than just deny socking. It could also be that this is not sock puppetry but meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 20:46, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply