October 2017

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to David Marchick, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 03:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

No, you don't get to remove well-sourced content in that manner. Jim1138 (talk) 03:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

It is not well sourced. That is why I removed it.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Marchick. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 03:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Take it to the talk page

edit

See talk:David Marchick wp:BRD Jim1138 (talk) 03:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Talk:David Marchick, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 17:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply