Malibu55

Per Wikipedia policy, in response to your recent edit to my talk page, please "avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation over the content or to express opinions of the other users involved. Instead, place such comments, if required on the talk page." Thanks, PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 04:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I'm sorry, I admit that was a mistake on my part, Thanks

RE:Your reply on PSUMark2006's talkpage

There are 2 sets of sources that don't agree (NFL.com vs Pro ref site). Consensus is with the NFL.com source. Rather than calmly discussing the changes on the article talkpage, you chose to simply revert to the source you favor again, and again, and again. The other changes you are making are formatting and layout and it appears consensus is against those changes as well. At this point the fact that you've created numerous sockpuppets to evade your block and continue to add information into the article because you think it is correct is simply disruptive. Rich already covered this in his discussion with you, but there are 2 issues here: the article content and your behavior. You have been repeatedly blocked for your behavior. Your views on this being correct info don't give you a free pass to be disruptive. I can't verify at the moment if you've truly been banned but I daresay if you have not been are extremely close to a topic ban, if not an outright ban from editing. Wikipedia is a community and if you are going to participate here you need to learn to work with others rather than just trying to force through the version that you favor.--Isotope23 19:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Do some real looking, every Brett Favre stats page on the net says 8,224, nfl.com has a type error, that's the issue, go edit someting you know about, 3 links to more stats were added, espn, SI and cbs, but you people deleted those links also, you are vandals, he's at 8,224, nfl.com made a mistake, the nfl doesn't make the site, people do it for them and a mistake was made.

Even if at the end of the day this turns out to be an NFL.com typo, that still doesn't change the fact that your behavior here has been unacceptable. If you see what is going on at the talkpage right now, PSUMark2006 is attempting to rectify these sources and has proposed a middle ground solution. Look, the bottom line is that talking about changes on the talk page, engaging other editors with civility, and trying to reach a WP:CONSENSUS is the right way to do things here. Creating sockpuppets, continuing to revert the article over and over, attacking other editors on the article talkpage because you disagree with them, and namecalling admins is the wrong way. I'm not sure I'm getting through to you here, but the problem here has been your behavior. I'm not trying to beat up on you here, but I want to make sure you understand that the problems you have had here with various admins relate to the way you've conducted yourself, not the article content.--Isotope23 20:29, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

At the end of the day all the stats are correct and they talked about them on Sunday Night Football, but I guess you smarter that Al Michaels and John Madden and the whole Sunday Night Football, anyones behavior aside, all info is correct and factual and belongs on the page and I'm talking about The 5 stats BeverlyHills85 added under Records and MilestonesMalibu55 20:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)malibu55

Then I will just leave it at that; it has been clearly stated here what the issues have been with your behavior under various accounts and your behavior here will decide if you can continue to edit this article or Wikipedia in general.--Isotope23 20:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I want to work with you to Isotope23, all I'm trying to say is all the info in BeverlyHills85 edit is correct and factual and they belong, the FoxSports.com link to the playoff stats is really easy for visitors, but as far as attempts being 8,223 or 8,224, PSUMark2006 has emailed sources about it, but I want to see the other factual additions BeverlyHills85 made on the page, that's all, they are not many additions BeverlyHills85 added, just 5 correct stats, 3 extra links to Favre's stats and a new direct citation to his playoff stats. Thanks, Malibu55 02:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)malibu55