Madokhn

Mulvane, Kansas

Please don't add nonnotable people to notable residents sections. Nyttend (talk) 15:29, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Mulvane, Kansas. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 24 hours, for disruptve editing. Edit warring with several editor will not get you anywhere, Please discuss your edits.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Rettetast (talk) 16:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Madokhn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As a resident and renowned journalist of the Mulvane community, I know what is true and false in the community, the new notable residents that I've been continuously adding back to the page have gotten me unjustly blocked from making edits. These particular residents were published in the newspaper with the given description... They ARE notable residents.

Decline reason:

None of this addresses the reason you were unblocked: edit warring. You need to use the talk page instead. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:41, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have reset your block to 24 hours since you have evaded while logged out using 72.205.231.236 (talk · contribs). Acroterion _(talk) 20:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Extended again due to activity by 68.103.79.169 (talk · contribs). Acroterion _(talk) 15:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tan | 39 18:33, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

AN/I discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:34, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Adding contents of Mulvane to your talk page

Please stop. If you do it again, I will remove your access to this page. Tan | 39 19:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

why can i not add this?Madokhn (talk) 20:36, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Is it because I'm Japanese? Madokhn (talk) 20:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

I have no idea what race to which you belong. Per WP:UP#COPIES, you cannot copy a page to your talk page, especially given that this particular page was involved in your indefinite block. Tan | 39 21:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. In retrospect, I was acting childish in everything that I have done in the last two months. I'm sorry for the inconvenience that I've caused you and all others that have been involved. Madokhn (talk) 03:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Oh! and would you go ahead and remove my access to this page [if that wouldn't be too much to ask]... I think it would be rather comical. Madokhn (talk) 03:15, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Talk page access restored

I have restored your talk page access in order to allow you to make an appeal per your email request.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Madokhn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am requesting to be unblocked from editing today because I believe I have matured and am now responsible and ready to contribute in the effort to make Wikipedia a better source of accurate information. I hope that I can prove through action that your decision to unblock me is the right decision.

Accept reason:

I've unblocked your account. PhilKnight (talk) 00:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello, I'm IVORK. An edit that you recently made to Bill Gates was actually not all that bad! my talk page. Thanks! — IVORK _Discuss 03:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, IVORK. That edit I made was not a test edit. It was an edit I made to correct vandalism on the above page in question.

Yeah no problem. It was actually another user. The one you reverted was a user trying to rollback the template but didn't realize he had included that text. No dramas mate. — IVORK _Discuss 10:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)