Cut the vandelisum on Nieghbours (the soap)articels, please. --86.29.251.164 17:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC) 86.29.241.228 02:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


--Strento 02:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)--Reply

I agree User:86.29.251.164! --86.25.52.66 09:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Your right!--Lilidor 15:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Known.--Pine oak 03:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)Reply




February 2007

edit

This is the only warning you will receive. If you vandalize Wikipedia once again, as you did to Banbury, you will be blocked. RJASE1 Talk 05:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


Cheeno?

edit

I agree over Anne Frank.--Lucia dd 02:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC) Oh dear, my poor Madge, they have treated you so brutaly. --Nikbar Sini 04:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC) It's all right, Nikbar!--Madge Mitchel 02:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


Madge= a vadal. --86.29.246.226 05:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Madge= Elspeth Monro, who is a suspected troll. --Longend. 05:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


 The administrative staff has been notified of your continued disruption to articles such as Lucy Robinson. --Thisisbossi 04:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Essjay (Talk) 06:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 01:34, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply