User talk:Macy.allen/sandbox

Tisheka's peer review

overall I thought the section was easy to understand and was balanced through out. great job on keeping the section short and straight to the point, without having too much filler.

neutral content- section seems to have neutral content. I would just recommend switching some of the words for instance, "some changes" ,"slowly transformed", and "widely", but besides that the content was neutral. reliable sources- most of the statements were sourced. the only statement that I couldn't find sourced was about the Japanese touchstones and American experience. I would just recommend just citing the sources for those statements, but besides that good job on having reliable sources.

the last thing I recommend doing is reworking the last statement to make it flow better with the rest of the paragraph. Twoods246 (talk) 22:39, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

neutral content5 reliable sources

Jenny's Peer Review

I believe that your section is pretty solid. There are some instances where the wording could be changed some such as with "some changes" to possibly "changes include..." I think that the amount of information that you have as opposed to the number of lines it takes up is good, but if you could find another source or two to back up your information, you could have a more solid section for your article. The one source that you do have, though, is solid since it comes from Columbia University. Also, don't forget that you can add links to other Wikipedia articles. So you may want to go back and link "baseball" and such so those reading will have the option to see those articles.

Jenwithagrin (talk) 03:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Leslye's Peer Review

Overall I think that this draft has some strong points and good information. I would try to stick to WikiVoice though, I felt like the content was in a way essay like. I would use more words that portray the encyclopedia type voice in writing. For example in the sentence when the word some was used I would change that because it seems like it is an opinion line. Other than that I think this is a good article entry. Leslyesullivan (talk) 04:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)