User talk:Mabalu/Archives/2014/December
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Breadbowlius in topic Advice about edit summary wording
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Advice about edit summary wording
Hi Mabalu, I'm Breadbowlius, and I need some help about edit summaries. I thought my change to Wedding dress was a valid one. Then, I thought, since the change was reverted, perhaps my edit summary suggested otherwise. Could I have some advice about the type of wording for edit summaries, as to avoid future misunderstanding? Sorry, I'm awfully new to editing jargon.
Also, I was wondering if I could possibly redo my change, since there were (and now, are) two twin sections on Wedding dress, one of which I attempted to remove as it had a section with identical content directly after it. Breadbowlius (talk) 21:42, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Breadbowlius: OMG - I'm sorry! I hold up my hands - I made a mistake. You were absolutely right - it IS a duplicate section. I am so sorry about this, and apologise profusely. I can only say I must have not been reading carefully enough. Sorry again. You'd have been absolutely within your rights to rip me a new one. Mabalu (talk) 22:28, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oh. Wow. That's a pretty big relief. Thanks a ton, Mabalu. Breadbowlius (talk) 22:46, 8 December 2014 (UTC)