User talk:MOOOOOPS/Archive 2
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
File:LA County Police.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:LA County Police.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MOOOOOPS (talk) 01:21, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
File:NYC Bureau of Water Supply Patch.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:NYC Bureau of Water Supply Patch.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MOOOOOPS (talk) 01:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Your message to me.
Dear MOOOOOPS
Apparently you didn't even look at what I did. I simply removed the following from the page:
"Saints Row 2 news
Saints Row 2, Rockstar's most recent release, is favored among fans,as dominating as being an excellent expansion package to their prior release in the franchise, Grand Theft Auto San Andreas. However, the graphics are predominantly synonymous to that of Grand Theft Auto 3, Rockstar's first three dimensional release. This was done to dramatically improve performance on older systems, and in addition, there is an option in-game to highten to a graphical level synonymous to San Andreas. This can explicitly be sighted as proof that Rockstar is eternally devoted to their releases, and as such, is still supporting Grand Theft Auto San Andreas. They are currently developing a patch Grand theft auto iv, which will conform to multifarious windows platforms.(low end-high end)The pin point date wasn't disclosed, however it has been revealed that the patch will submerge within time frame of January/February.
Physics engine
Saints Row 2 will not affix any additional structural physics to the game, so car handling, with other physics, will remain "GTA SA" native."
Someone was obviously trying to make a joke referring to the Saints Row series being similar to the Grand Theft Auto series.
I fail to see how removing vandalism was not constructive and I don't think I deserved to be talked down to because of it, furthermore I believe you only did that because I'm not a user.
I do not want, or expect an apology, I simply wanted to point out an error on your part.
sincerely Anonymous vandalism remover —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.7.50 (talk) 11:09, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
NYC LEA cats
I've created a new category for LEAs in New York City, because there are so many! This is an exception to the categorisation system, so just giving you a heads up as you're the major contributor. ninety:one 15:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- I see what you were trying to do, but I was going to leave all the NYPD units in Category:New York City Police Department, and have that as a subcat of Category:Law enforcement agencies of New York City. Otehrwise there will be far too many NYPD articles in Category:New York City Police Department. Is that OK? ninety:one 22:54, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Please explain to me why Randy Daniels deserves a mention in the election article. The alleged source contains no information about his possible candidacy or the election at all. - Rockyobody (talk) 01:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- My mistake MOOOPS, I copied your username by mistake. A thousand apologies for accusing you. - Rockyobody (talk) 02:43, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. It was an honest mistake. MOOOOOPS (talk) 02:49, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem
Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
- File:NYPD Harbor Unit Patch.jpg
- File:NYPD Movie-TV Unit Patch.jpg
- File:NYPD Task Force Patch.jpg
- File:NYPD Taxi Squad Patch.jpg
- File:NYPD Traffic Enforcement Patch.jpg
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Fixed the problem. MOOOOOPS (talk) 05:42, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Your rollback request
Done: just remember that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam, and that using rollback to revert edits you simply disagree with, or to revert-war with other editors, can lead to it being removed from your account. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 21:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Law enforcement in New York
Hi, I'm currently drafting an article about Law enforcement in New York (state) here. Just wondered if you have any suggestions as to information I should include? I'm going to do all of the state law relating to peace officers eventually, but feel free to edit with stuff about uniforms, equipment or firearms etc if you want. This will be the first "Law enforcement in..." article we've done for a US state, so could set the standard. Thanks! ninety:one 20:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- I checked out the page, and I love it so far. I will add and edit some stuff, but you've done an excellent job. MOOOOOPS (talk) 01:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Disputes
I had a dispute with "randomguy" before, and someone else stepped in to defend me with the "honesty and good faith policy" about edits I know to be true.-DANO- (talk) 04:05, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Honesty and good faith should be used when you do it once or twice and honestly didn't know if you should have added the info or not. I have seen 6 of your edits reverted on that page, and you still keep adding the info. That is not honesty and good faith, but rather annoying and vandalism. In addition, you were explained the situation about adding non reliable references by randomguy, and in my opinion, you are lucky he or anyone else didn't start issuing official warnings before mine. MOOOOOPS (talk) 04:17, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
WikiBirthday
I saw from here that it's been exactly two years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 03:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks alot! MOOOOOPS (talk) 03:12, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Suffolk County Police Department
THE SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE PAGE IS WRONG. UNDER HIGHWAY PATROL, IT SAYS THAT SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF'S HAVE LITTLE TO NO EXPERIENCE IN HIGHWAY PATROL DUTIES. THIS IS TOTALLY FALSE, AS DEPUTY SHERIFFS HAVE BEEN DOING VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT LONG BEFORE THE SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE DEPT WAS CREATED IN 1960. ADD TO THE FACT THAT DEPUTY SHERIFFS ATTEND THE SAME POLICE ACADEMY AND RECEIVE THE "SAME" TRANING AS SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE OFFICERS
YOUR PAGE IS FALSE, PLEASE FIX IT. IT'S AN INSULT TO SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFFS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.57.51.106 (talk) 18:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- I responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 18:31, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Arlington County Auxiliary Article
What what you consider proof of the update to the ACPD auxiliary article? All of the information contained therein is a matter of public record, including the fact that the program is dealing with two ADA claims, the fact that our numbers are way down, and that officers are leaving due to management issues. Thus, all of the information in the update we supplied is verifiable; the standard is "verifiable," not "requires proof prior to posting."
Ericbonetti (talk) 12:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 20:45, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Moooops,
- Again, with all due respect, the standard enunciated by Wikipedia is "verifiable," not "proven in advance." If the latter were the standard, 95% of all content on Wikipedia would be removed. It is important that you not attempt to supplant Wikipedia's standards with your own.
- Can you show me where such Wikipedia announces the guidelines you have articulated? As an officer with the department, I would be grateful if you could prove that this is indeed the standard. You claim it to be the standard, but I have not seen any proof and do not believe your claim to be accurate. Indeed, the standard is:
- "Any material lacking a reliable source may be removed, but editors might object if you remove material without giving them sufficient time to provide references, and it has always been good practice, and expected behavior of Wikipedia editors (in line with our editing policy), to make reasonable efforts to find sources oneself that support such material, and cite them.Ericbonetti (talk) 01:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 02:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: New York City Police Department edit
There was nothing untoward about my comment it was quiet truthful, I was only pointing out that unfortunately a large number of police officers are overweight and that this is not only effecting their performance but also our safety. You say my comment "did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted" this is only in your eyes and a truthful information about a public body, no matter if it is negative should be allowed.
- Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Murphy
Drafted as a third baseman, used as a second basemen during winter leagues, has only played first base since outfield troubles, he is an infielder. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.139.198 (talk) 03:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 04:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- It is not proper to list him as an outfielder, have you considered that maybe the Mets have just not updated their website, and that it is our duty to go and provide the world with accurate information? Simply put Murphy is a first baseman, as Sports Management Student, he projects as a first baseman, and will be there as his career continues, barring a monumental grasp of second base. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.139.198 (talk) 05:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 05:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- If there was an official mathematics website, and it said 1+1=41, and there was a Wikipedia article that said 1+1=2, would you change it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.139.198 (talk) 05:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 05:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- If there was an official mathematics website, and it said 1+1=41, and there was a Wikipedia article that said 1+1=2, would you change it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.139.198 (talk) 05:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 05:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- It is not proper to list him as an outfielder, have you considered that maybe the Mets have just not updated their website, and that it is our duty to go and provide the world with accurate information? Simply put Murphy is a first baseman, as Sports Management Student, he projects as a first baseman, and will be there as his career continues, barring a monumental grasp of second base. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.139.198 (talk) 05:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- As a prelaw student I understand ethics, and proving things, but this is the correct information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.139.198 (talk) 05:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Solution
I propose maybe adding a utility man feature on the template, or maybe contacting the mets. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.139.198 (talk) 05:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 05:51, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
TBTA "Police" article
The purpose for my edit of the TBTA Police article is due to the misinformation which is clearly stated within the article. I cited my sources according to New York State law when I stated that the TBTA law enforcement division was not made of New York State authorized Police Officers. TBTA Officers go through a 3 month training acadamey while Statewide the standards to become a police officer in New York are 6 months. TBTA Officers Geographic Area of Employment is NOT the entire State of New York (as in currently stated on the page), they are assigned to work on the bridges and tunnels of the City of New York. New York State Law gives them enforcement authority as Peace Officers, which allows them to function in some aspects as regular police do; however, this is limited when they are off duty and off of their property. For example, if a woman in Albany NY were yelling to an off duty TBTA Officer that a man just raped her (Felony crime) and she gave the TBTA Peace officer a description of the perpetrator, the peace officer would not be able to make a probable cause arrest based on that description, he wold only be empowered to make such an arrest if the crime was in fact committed in his presence. This is a major difference between police and peace officer in the state of New York and it is important to distinguish this difference in a an encyclopedia which takes an authoritative tone, the interested public who would look up this article would be also be interested to know how a Peace Officer of the TBTA could assist them and in what capacity they can perform their duties. I cited my comments and do not think I disrespected the TBTA in any way; I simply made it clear their functions and the limitations of such functions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ArchangelsSword (talk • contribs) 15:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 15:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
It's Moors!
Just FYI. –xenotalk 20:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- LMAO MOOOOOPS! MOOOOOPS (talk) 20:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Humane law enforcement
I have nominated Humane law enforcement, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humane law enforcement. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 12:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:NYC Sanitation Police badge.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:NYC Sanitation Police badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 07:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
I see you've put them as peace officers - I can't find them in 2.20 so I can only assume they're special patrolmen? ninety:one (reply on my talk) 20:24, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 20:51, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, I read that as all being HHC. Will make corrections. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 22:13, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Your welcome. I also read that the same way as you the first few times I read the CPL. MOOOOOPS (talk) 00:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, I read that as all being HHC. Will make corrections. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 22:13, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
lapd page
There is still vandelism on the LAPD page, see the "village" and the abbreviation of the LAPD was changed to SOS... I dont really know how to edit wiki pages well... was hoping someone who edited in the past would fix it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.153.145 (talk) 01:04, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the message. I edited the page and removed the vandalism. MOOOOOPS (talk) 01:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Penn Foster Career School/College
Stop changing the Penn Foster Career School page. And stop changing the Penn Foster College page. The online diploma doesn't work for students who are trying to get a job or go to a university. The school is trying to make a profit off people; the diplomas aren't real. Sweetfornow (talk) 13:34, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 14:39, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- How are my articles NOT meeting Wikipedia's standards? Can you explain without cyberbullying someone? Or do you have no manners online? Sweetfornow (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2009 (UTC) MOOOOOPS (talk) 14:39, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 14:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm guessing that you're a Penn Foster High School graduate? I'm not willing to make anymore edits to the Penn Foster pages. My edits are not wrong; I have citations for all of my edits. Sweetfornow (talk) 14:51, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 00:09, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm guessing that you're a Penn Foster High School graduate? I'm not willing to make anymore edits to the Penn Foster pages. My edits are not wrong; I have citations for all of my edits. Sweetfornow (talk) 14:51, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Responded on your talk page. MOOOOOPS (talk) 14:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Discussion at WikiProject New Jersey
Hi, MOOOOOPS, User:Nightscream and I had a disagreement over certain parts of NJ municipality articles; because the discussion could potentially affect hundreds of articles, we decided to bring the discussion to WikiProject New Jersey. I would value your input in the discussion, which you can find here. Thanks, A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 15:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Emergency vehicle lighting and Humane Society police
Hi there,
regarding your reversion of that IP editors removal of humane society police, as you appear to have some knowledge in this area, maybe you could add some citations to help support it under WP:V?
Thanks! OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 07:24, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'll add a few references. MOOOOOPS (talk) 20:02, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
hospital police badge on wikipedia.
The badge you have shown on wikipedia is an old badge from the Dept. of Hospitals. Since it's change to NYC Health & Hospitals Corp. the badge is significally different. The current badge has the seal of NYC encircled in the center and the top states"New york city Hospital" with a lower banner stating Police. The badge wikipedia is showing is from the 1970's. Most Police agencies with Teamsters Local 237 in NYC have the circle seal in the center of the badge, such as Juvenille Justice, Dept. of Health, Dept. of Homeless Services etc.
- Thanks for the info. I have a photo of an updated badge(I believe it is the current one). I'll upload it. MOOOOOPS (talk) 01:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Please update your status with WP:VG
Dear WikiProject Video games member,
You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.
The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.
All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:
- Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
- Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)
Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
Please stop making changes
Look, I know you think you're helping us maintain our page, but please stop making these changes. We know what and when things are happening with our agency, and you keep making changes that are not correct.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.83.168.251 (talk) 18:48, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |