User talk:M347758/Archive 2

3RR warning

 

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. — Feezo (Talk) 05:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Trolling on Flying Spaghetti Monster

Wikipedia is not the place to play these sorts of games. — Matt Crypto 10:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

 

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

unblocking after agreement not to remove cited material nor engage in edit wars. Breach of this agreement will result in an indef block

Request handled by: Glen 03:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

I have taken this block up with the blocking admin, and will get back to you as soon as I can Glen 23:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

See User talk:Matt Crypto#User:MikeURL. I do feel your removal of properly cited material isnt appropriate. I could probably get you unblocked if you agree not to do this (or similar such edits) to the article. You could perhaps add that the official website makes no mention of it being a parody, but removing properly cited material from articles because you disagree with it is not on. Let me know here if you understand this. Thanks Glen 23:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Glen and your suggestion is a good one. It looks to me like I was blocked, permanently, for civil discourse on the discussion page. I agree that I edited the article too aggressively (even though there is considerable disagreement on the discussion page as to whether "parody religion" is appropriate). I hope that Matt has the best of intentions but I must make it clear that I will not be intimidated by this into backing away from making my point on the discussion page. However, Matt's defense of the block seems to suggest that he believes it is appropriate to use his admin authority to stifle discourse on the discussion page as well.MikeURL 01:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Posted incident to [[1]] since I believe this block was inappropriate.MikeURL 16:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)