LymeExpert

March 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lyme disease. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Tim Vickers (talk) 21:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Further to the above warning, the link you've now added twice to the above article is unsuitable, as it links to a website that espouses a fringe viewpoint; the selection of literature on the linked page is chosen to support a specific position, and labelling the link as "Medical Literature Summaries" could be misleading to our readers. Wikipedia is not intended to be used for advocacy. You are welcome to start a discussion on the article talk-page explaining why you believe the link should be included, but if you continue inserting it without discussion your account may be blocked and, in egregious cases of linkspamming, the website blacklisted. EyeSerene^talk 21:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Link assessment

You should read this review

• Cooper JD, Feder HM (2004). "Inaccurate information about lyme disease on the internet". Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 23 (12): 1105–8. PMID 15626946. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

In this assessment, the information provided by lymeinfo.net was mostly inaccurate. This is not an appropriate external link, please read Wikipedia:MEDMOS#External_links. Tim Vickers (talk) 21:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

• Based on Tim's comment above, I suggest that you do not re-add the link to the Lyme disease article, though you are welcome to discuss the matter further at Talk:Lyme disease. —C.Fred (talk) 21:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerene^talk 21:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm afraid adding a link to the parent page instead of the directory page doesn't invalidate the above warnings. We can't be playing this game all night. EyeSerene^talk 21:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)