Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Lust2636, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as CIDCO Inc, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Timneu22 · talk 19:16, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of CIDCO Inc edit

 

A tag has been placed on CIDCO Inc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 19:16, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

{{hangon}}Lust2636 (talk) 19:19, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

This page should no more be deleted then AT&T, Lucent or IBM. As someone who works in the telecom industry and people keep searching Cidco Mailbox, and CIDCO, and getting a re-direct here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_and_Industrial_Development_Corporation

You can see why it would confuse and upset people. Please leave the page and the information intact. Furthermore, please put a fork on the top of the - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_and_Industrial_Development_Corporation ...article, to click and re-direct to CIDCO Inc. Without CIDCO Inc, we would not have the caller ID we have today, nor would it be widely implimented. I think it qualifies as a worthy company. Furthermore - I work for World Media, and have no stake or business associations with CIDCO, other then we have to de-crypt the CIDCO/Bellcore databursts in our handeling of phone calls. Lust2636 (talk) 19:27, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Furthermore, G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion. Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion...

My page does not qualify under this as the company is BANKRUPT and non-functional, so, what would I be promoting? a company that is out of business? This article will be as detailed and exaustive as I can make it, not only on CIDCO the company, but on the technology and the telephonic side of things. There are not alot of these resources or information pages online.

Do not just tell me you are going to delete my article, tell me how to make it better, offer input and critique. I'm an engineer and write technical instructions for my job. Let me know how to make this article better. Lust2636 (talk) 19:48, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Your recent statements show that you have a conflict of interest about these recent CIDCO articles. You should not be writing about this topic, as you are unlikely to have a neutral point of view.Timneu22 · talk 22:13, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Lust2636/CIDCO Inc edit

 

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on User:Lust2636/CIDCO Inc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of User:Lust2636/CIDCO Inc and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 01:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Cidco MailStation page goes back to 14 october 2006, and pre-dates my page for Cidco Inc. I was trying to improve the Mailstation page, and fill in information about the mailstation, and about Cidco, neither of which seem to be appreciated, as its getting flagged to delete the MailStation page. My personal space was getting flagged for deletion, which is supposed to be protected under G2. Test pages. This excludes the sandbox and the users' own user space, as well as pages that were created in error (see G6)... I'm not a happy user at the moment. Lust2636 (talk) 06:16, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply