Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Andy Reed appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 18:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Andy Reed

edit

Just a note about your recent edits to Andy Reed. I think this article needs checking over to make sure the facts are supported by references. The personal life section in particular needs robust sourcing. The list of rebellions has no source and the explanation about Andy Reed's attitude to identity cards doesn't match up with the source given. Personally I dislike using Publicwhip as a reference because its definition of 'rebellion' is not appropriate, and the Revolts website publishes briefings about key votes which are more helpful and robust.

However I think you may have gone too far in removing material about expenses. A blog analysis by a local political opponent is not a reliable source but what is said in local papers is, and it's important to write an article that is balanced all round. Sam Blacketer (talk) 15:16, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Andy Reed - page blanking

edit

You have carried out page blanking on Andy Reed. This may affect the neutral point of view of the article. The blanking has been reverted.

  Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Lboids (talk) 07:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:AndyReed-MP&Family.jpg

edit

Greetings Lufbrawatch. I'm not sure what you were trying to do with your 18 September edit as you didn't include a summary. I reverted only because it didn't appear to do anything but contained a link to another photo without an appropriate license. If you have a good photo you are willing to make copyright free and need any help, please email me. Regards JRPG (talk) 15:39, 19 September 2014 (UTC)Reply