Reference errors on 29 September

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply


Hello I'm sorry I was typing way too fast (Lovelyxo (talk) 00:29, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Lovelyxo)Reply

October 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Passengerpigeon. I noticed that in this edit to Stephen Curry, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Passengerpigeon (talk) 12:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Passengerpigeon (talk) 12:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yes I removed it to the awards and honors section (Lovelyxo (talk) 12:59, 2 October 2016 (UTC)User talk:Lovelyxo)Reply

Reference errors on 5 October

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ayesha Curry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love for Sale. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Block notice

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=bons mots If you would just unblock my normal account then I wouldn't have to create another one I've waited a year, I follow of all the directions. Like seriously what more do you want for me to do to please you I can't do anything on normal account because you blocked my talk page}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:42, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply