User talk:LouisCartier/Archive 1

Archive 1

Welcome...

Hello, LouisCartier, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or .  Again, welcome! Mxtt.prior (talk) 14:31, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Max Fosh

The article Max Fosh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Local news coverage of YouTube stunts doesn't add up to significant RS coverage required by the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ralbegen (talk) 11:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Word of advice

You should probably make yourself aware of WP:CANVASS. I'm willing to believe that this wasn't truly your intent, but you can hopefully see how a less charitable observer might interpret this, this and this edit as being exactly that, although, to your credit, at least you didn't tell anyone what to vote. There's also no need to ping editors to their own talk pages, they get a notification for everything you add by default. AngryHarpy‍^talk 16:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks - LouisCartier (talk) 16:48, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

WP:AGF

It may be a bad idea to explicitly state that you do not WP:ASSUMEGOODFAITH when a user is above a certain age, as you have done here. It sounds like you're coming at things from a broadly inclusionist standpoint, so you may enjoy reading more on the philosophy, or even joining the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians and/or the Inclusion WikiProject. This would likely be far more fruitful and a more productive use of your time. Please don't see people who follow current policies or don't ascribe to an inclusionist philosophy as evil, as you seem to. Domeditrix (talk) 13:25, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Ah! You've seen it! I hope you're not offended and thank you for answering, actually. Interesting to read about it, really puts things into perspective and nice to know that I'm not alone here. - LouisCartier (talk) 18:59, 13 April 2021 (UTC)