Lothar of the Hill People
Hi Lothar, I think Social apartheid looks good. It would be nice to have some quality apartheid-related articles in Wikipedia, so I support what you're doing.--G-Dett 18:43, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
I want to inform you of WP:3RR, Wikipedia's 3 revert rule. It says that if you revert another editor over 3 times, in any way, you can be blocked. Please be careful not to revert other editors and violate this rule. Jayjg (talk) 20:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, I edited it once, and reverted 3 times. That's not a violation. You have to actually revert 4 times to be blocked. In any event, the article is now protected. The 3RR rule is preventive, not punitive, so if the article is protected, then the editor is not blocked. Perhaps instead of trying to force your views on other editors you'd prefer to enter into dialog with them. Jayjg (talk) 21:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Tell you what, why don't we start fresh. You stop moving articles, and I'll stop moving articles, and we'll discuss these things first. Deal? Jayjg (talk) 21:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Once the article is protected, it is protected, and I'm an involved editor so I'm not allowed to unprotect it. BTW, I notice you've created a 3RR report, I guess you didn't read my comments above, or we're not starting fresh? Jayjg (talk) 21:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, but then you go and do something like this. By the way, in AfD discussions the only "Delete" counts as "Delete". Anyway, if you want to keep battling, then there's little point in dialog. If you change your mind (and ways), let me know. Jayjg (talk) 05:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Look, I'd like to work with you, but you keep trying to delete "Allegations of apartheid" articles even as you say you will stop, so I'm not sure what your real intentions are. Jayjg (talk) 06:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Re: Thanks
editNo problem. John Smith's 19:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Following your recent participation in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 July 30#Allegations of American apartheid, you may be interested to know that a related article, Allegations of Chinese apartheid, is currently being discussed on AfD. Comments can be left at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of Chinese apartheid. -- ChrisO 15:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,Newyorkbrad 18:10, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Lothar. I've brought your name up as a potential additional party in the above case; see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Allegations of apartheid/Workshop#Additional parties for more details. Picaroon (t) 01:50, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
You deserve this, by the way
editThe Editor's Barnstar
|
The Editor's Barnstar | |
| Awarded to Lothar of the Hill People for his concise rewrite of allegations of apartheid. Nice work! 146.115.58.152 19:49, 5 October 2007 (UTC) |
The article Mars Hill Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet the GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 14:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)