I am not this person, and your assumtion is without cause or reason. Is this byte the noobie... Your have no reason for this.

Mr Santin... Is it a violation of wikipolicy to read this Wikipedia help files so that I may have a "Shocking Familiarity with Wikipedia".

It would seem that it's SOP for admin, to have such "Shocking disrespect" for the basic human concept of civility and due process(even with in the twisted set of unevenly enforced Wikpolicy)?

Uncivil, unjustified and shows total lack of respect.Lordbyte 22:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lordbyte (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet or Joehazelton and this action is very uncivil and lack the good faith, which wikipedia alleges to have. Do a check user and find out the truth that I am not Joehazelton or any one you know.

Decline reason:

For a supposedly brand new user, you're displaying a shocking familiarity with Wikipedia policies and norms, in addition to editing much the same articles as the user you're accused of being a sockpuppet of. Sorry. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.