LordBossMaster100

August 2022

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LordBossMaster100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have done nothing but good to this site for 2 years, no major violations, always did useful and accurate editing, defending people etc. I’m not a bad user and I have never intendedly tried to destroy this site at all! Please just hear me out, I’m not a bad person, I was not so good back then sure I’ll give you that, but I have changed, honest to god. I really did. I took the deal to stay off for half a year, which I did, 8 months to be exact and that’s more than enough time. And I came back fresh, new and improved. No rule breaks or anything. All I am asking for is a chance. And I promise you, you will not be disappointed. All I want to do is good things, edit sites, stop the vandals and defend users. Please read every word I have to say and check my history and take everything, and absolutely everything I’ve done into consideration. I’m really really sorry about events back then, I truly am. I understand all the polices and I’m not gonna deny anything because your right. but I really am a good person.

Decline reason:

This doesn't address the reason for the block. If you appeal again and don't address the reasons you were blocked, you will force us to remove talk page access. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

LordBossMaster100 (talk) 23:23, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LordBossMaster100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Let’s do this again. You are absolutely right, I did make another account, I will not deny it at all, I WAS BossKoolaid, but not anymore, that past is dead. let me explain why. You see I think I was too new for wiki back in 2020, and I didn’t really know what I was doing at all, it was all different and I never edited anything before. The main reason what started this charade is because of me adding full names to character pages when really it wasn’t supposed to be like that like Michael Carter, Zachariah Dingle, Toyah Laverne Battersby etc etc each from these soaps, I didn’t listen to anyone. and I felt really stupid and I was removed for what I did and I totally get why. Full names belong to fandom, and I won’t dare touch that info from those sites anymore. When I was blocked for the first time, I really did act stupid and did it again because generally and being brutally honest I didn’t know what socking even was, but after the 4th/5th time, I finally realised how wrong I was, how stupid I was acting. I was told by an admin that if I lay low for a few months, just maybe I can edit and restore myself, that was from the T-Jay account. I stayed off for at least 8 months from January 2 2020 up until 5 October 2020 when I joined as this one, I felt like a new user, a fresh person ready to edit and not break the rules ever again. That’s the socking history straight to the point, I DID sock, I may not have known it at the time, but I did it and I’m truly sorry for my actions from those accounts. Now to the reason why I should be unblocked, I strongly believe I should because ever since I made this account, my editing has been widely useful and resourceful and I never became a major troublemaker like last time, no vandalism, no irrelevant information, no unconstructive edits etc none of that, I excellently communicate with other people too and I’ve stopped a lot of vandalism and even sock puppetry. I truly and fully learned from my mistakes, I feel that I’ve retributed from my 3,000 edit history being filled with good contributions and I promise and assure you I won’t ever, ever, ever sock again because I know the rules to the extent. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 09:27, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Heard it all before. Special:Diff/939674361: "I have 100% learned my lesson I had a large think about what I did. I understand why you blocked me. I am truly sorry for socking, it will NEVER happen again". Special:Diff/941676528: "I’ll avoid any socking. I’ll take the offer. Infinity promise" And yet, here we are once again. You're making the same promises. You are now banned from English Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:12, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorry if I was also a bit pissed off. I don’t like feeling that way at all. It’s just that I was doing so well and then this happened to me. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 10:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

I feel the need to correct you here… You have made out to the future reviewer that your behaviour on this new account has been nothing but rosy. That isn't true. You have received more than 10 warnings for your disruptive edit patterns, edit wars and the way you have spoken to fellow editors, and you have also received two blocks in the past. You were told that any more disruptive behaviour following the block expiry would result in an indefinite block – instead of listening to that advice and improving your on-Wiki behaviour, you got into an edit war. A very lenient administrator dealt with my reporte for these incidents and you were given over 5 chances to redeem yourself, but I believe now is the time for more serious action. I implore the reviewing administrator to take this into consideration. – Meena • 14:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

I understand your criticism and I’m not gonna get annoyed. But this matter is to do with the sock puppetry that I gave up 2 years ago. And this was not because of those events. All of that stuff you mentioned is true, but do you know what I did? I stopped each time and eventually learned from my mistakes. This block had nothing to do with edit wars or anything like that, this was sock puppetry. I really love editing Wikipedia and I really have no intention on harming anyone because it’s not a good thing at all. All of those wars that happened where on account of those IPs addresses mostly in the ones I’ve witnessed and I didn’t really know where I was supposed to flag them, but I was told by users and I took note of that. Seriously, I am never gonna sock anymore and all i want is to do good things here. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 14:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

I’m 18 years old with autism and all I wanna do is great things in my life and around the web and just to make people happy. Note I am not trying to make that an excuse, it’s just me being honest about myself. I really do enjoy editing Wikipedia, I honestly find it great. But now that this has happened? It feels terrible, a major slap to the head. An event that I gave up a long time ago came back to haunt me. Something that I killed a long time ago, I didn’t know about sock puppetry, but now I do and I promised myself I would stop using fandom, stop with the names and learn. Sure I have been involved in some form of conflict, but that is a rare and not a constant thing. I don’t trash and vandalise pages, make terrible edits like adding nothing but false information all the time, I mean surely, by a bunch of things you may see in my edit history is more positive than negative. I wasn’t some sock who had the intention on coming back to actually cause trouble, I generally learned from it and like I said, all I wanted to do is good and I never intend on socking or being involved with conflict. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

And this account isn’t really new since I made it in October 2020. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 14:48, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

• This request is much more on point, so thank you for that. A couple of things: I appreciate your candor about being on the spectrum, but you might want to read WP:Wikipedia is not therapy. Of course, autism isn't a reason to block someone, the point is, it is fine to be here and have issues, but you are still held to the same standards of conduct that everyone else is. So no one is going to hold that against you. I think you probably get that, but I wanted to point out that essay anyway. I'm going to take you at your word, that you are being sincere here, and so I have to ask what you plan to do to keep yourself from being disruptive in the future? If your unblock request is to be taken seriously, you would have to do a couple of things, such as promise to only use one account. I see this edit [1] was just a copy and paste from the main article but you didn't give attribution, which is a problem. Meena also makes some good points above. I see a lot of frustration from you at Charles Martinet. Very intense and pointed edits over a birthday, which I suppose is what led to your block. You do have an intensity at times that can (and has) caused you problems, so I'm wondering what your plan is to prevent this from happening again. I won't be reviewing your request, btw, but I think these are all valid questions and considerations that must be answered, for who ever does. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 16:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

I’ll tell you what I’m gonna do. And I’m sorry but I just needed to vent. And I did stop with Charles Martinet and learned that it needs reliable sourcing. What I plan to do is that if I’m unblocked, I promise to never ever violate or break anymore rules ever again, no more alt accounts for socking, only for the right reasons, if I see an edit war, I will stick to the three revert rule and report it properly. I will do absolutely everything right and I promise you that Dennis. And I’ll most importantly never forget to add the sources.LordBossMaster100 (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

I promise absolutely everything you told me. 100% honest to god LordBossMaster100 (talk) 17:29, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

And If I ever do get stressed or intense. I will of course take breaks for a day or 2 and come back nice and fresh thanks to a suggestion from Blanchey. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 17:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

And finally, with the whole Salman Rushdie thing you mentioned, If I ever edit backgrounds, I’ll just research the right words and attribute from my own fingers. (My own words I mean). I’m going to and I WILL change to the full extent and hopefully never see any blocks or warnings ever again for as long as I’m here.LordBossMaster100 (talk) 17:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

@Dennis Brown: thank you for being so understanding. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 17:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Also please could you also take into account the vendettas that ZestyLemonz has against me? He’s tried to get me taken down before, I believe one time he tried to hack me and he’s used threats of suicide, awful disgusting belittling language and he’s told me to my face he will harass me until I leave. It’s what he has always wanted because I’ve been catching him out a lot because socks like him don’t deserve to be here, he comes back and actually stirs trouble unlike me. He’s even harassed and harmed me as an ip before too. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 17:42, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

And that was during the Charles Martinet incident. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 17:43, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, LordBossMaster, I think you made some really good points and promises above, so there’s a chance that this could go your way, if the reviewing admin is truly convinced that you won’t break any policies anymore. What may happen is that they keep this account block and make you go back to your very original account from October 2019 (User:BossKoolaid). If they would rather you used this account, or they make you go back to your original but you forgot the password and would have to use this one, I strongly advise that you declare your alternate accounts on your userpage. Blanchey (talk) 18:07, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

I haven’t used the BossKoolaid one for 2 years. I don’t know the info. This one’s just fine. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 18:24, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

How should I exactly declare them? LordBossMaster100 (talk) 18:24, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

I’ll just put them down here BossKoolaid, Bosskoolaid7910, BossKoolaid2 and T-Jay Westall where all me. All dead and ones that I never wanna use again, those where the old me. This is the new me. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 18:26, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

I would suggest adding an Alternate account userbox to your page, this is obviously ONLY if you are unblocked, maybe it will even be the deal to getting unblocked. Feel free to copy this

This user has alternative accounts named

BossKoolaid, BossKoolaid7910, Bosskoolaid2, T-Jay Westall.

Blanchey (talk) 18:28, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

per WP:SOCKLEGIT, you MUST declare alternate accounts so that admins and other editors can determine whether or not you are using them legitimately. It’s highly unlikely that the other 4 will be unblocked but you should still mention them. Blanchey (talk) 18:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Blanchey Please don't continue to provide advice full of conjecture which isn't completely accurate. There are enough admin eyes on this already and an open appeal. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Understood. Thank you for dealing with it. Blanchey (talk) 18:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

@Blanchey: thanks for your advice. It really means a lot. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 18:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

That is another thing I will most certainly do next time. Label these for the right reason to have them. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 18:35, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

• sigh* I expected this. I knew it wouldn’t matter. Nobody would believe me anyways. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 20:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

I took the offer. I stayed away like I said. What more do you want? Just what can I exactly do??? LordBossMaster100 (talk) 20:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Socks like Zesty are much worse than me. they are the ones you guys should be hunting. The reason for denial makes absolutely no sense because I was being serious and fully sincere and I made a bunch of valid points. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 20:43, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

And ANOTHER thing, that stuff I said last time, I wasn’t even given ma good denial reason! I was told “in light of the comment below, no.” Without any points to back it up. That one was incredibly bias.LordBossMaster100 (talk) 20:44, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Talk page access removed

Since I don't think you are getting Joe Jobbed, and these socks are you, I've removed talk page access. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:28, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

LBM100, with Dennis Brown's permission I've restored Talk page access and your ability to use Wikipedia e-mail. Dennis thought that the two socks that vandalized your page after your block belonged to you. I explained that a much more likely explanation is that they were Zestylemonz. Finally, you may make another unblock request, but I strongly urge you to be clearer about (1) your history of socking and (2) the reasons why you believe you should be unblocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

@Bbb23: I’ve done it again and I did it a lot better, explaining everything I can. LordBossMaster100 (talk) 09:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)