Hi, you listed this case last month. I've taken it up as the meditator. I suspect there could nolonger be any problem here. The article currently has a criticism section which covers similar ground to what was reverted. Compare current with reverted. Please get back to me on my talk page when you read this, either telling me that it is ok (so that I can close the case) or explaining why the new version still has some problems with it. Thanks. Mathmo Talk 13:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

As this was put here close to a month ago I'll be closing this very soon. Mathmo Talk 05:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply