Hi I'm Little Spike.


Welcome!

Hello, Little Spike, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Cheers, TewfikTalk 19:06, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

PS you may want to introduce yourself on your user page and keep this for correspondance.

Thanks. - Little Spike 7:13pm EST, July 17th, 2006

revert dispute International reactions to the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict edit

Hi and welcome, There is an dispute in International reactions to the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict. The dispute is over inclusion of the AIPAC reaction to a US House of Representatives Resolution expressing support for Israel. Various accusations are being thrown around by Comrade438 eg. im being accused of trying to paint a "zionist conspiracy".

Comrade438 has made few silly edits, and comments, along with what might be a threat. It degenerated to Comrade438 blocking the page without consulting WP:RPP, then reverting last changes. I am trying to alert other users who have edited the article to this dispute as I believe the detail should be included. Is it possible you can look and see if you agree that AIPAC's reaction should be included in the article? I dont believe its a content issue and is possible trolling. I previously highlighted the problems on wikipedian noticeboard [1] 82.29.227.171 21:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the information. - Little Spike 11:50am EST, August 2nd, 2006.

Beverly Hills 90210 edit

While we appreciate your help, simply restating the title of an article and linking elsewhere is not enough for an encyclopedia article. Please do not create any more. Thanks, and happy editing! --Daniel Olsen 05:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've noticed that some of the text in the Season two article has been directly copied from tv.com. I see that TV.com allows users to edit the summaries, but if you are not the person who wrote the summary for tv.com, there are copyright problems with copying the text. --Daniel Olsen 05:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
So are you admitting that you copied the material without permission? --Daniel Olsen 05:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Since there are no prior versions to revert to, the articles will have to be deleted. Feel free to rewrite the articles again in your own words. --Daniel Olsen 05:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Beverly Hills 90210 Season 3 edit

A tag has been placed on Beverly Hills 90210 Season 3, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to provide more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately, and also put a note on Talk:Beverly Hills 90210 Season 3. An administrator should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 1 under Articles. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such material. The same applies to Beverly Hills 90210 Season 4, Beverly Hills 90210 Season 5, Beverly Hills 90210 Season 6, Beverly Hills 90210 Season 7, Beverly Hills 90210 Season 8, Beverly Hills 90210 Season 9, and Beverly Hills 90210 Season 10. —Swpb talk contribs 05:15, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism edit

Edits such as this [2] are considered vandalism. Please refrain from making changes that will confuse others and harm the project. --Spangineerws (háblame) 23:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


A tag has been placed on Baghdad Market Bombing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wikipedian27 16:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Baghdad Market Bombing edit

I am sorry that your page has been deleted, but let's say if you went to a library and opened an encyclopedia, would you like to see one sentence about the event? If you were going to add more to the article, you should construct the whole article before publishing it, or it is going to be deleted. Try doing a little more research, and then publish it. The deletion was consistent with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Wikipedian27 16:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Now it's a good article. I read it and it was informal and interesting. Wikipedian27 16:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've been here long enough. I'll handle it. Wikipedian27 17:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

An Automated Message from HagermanBot edit

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 00:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Front page edit

Hey! Your article's featured on the front page in the news section. Wikipedian27 16:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Practice edit

Confirmed human cases and mortality rate of avian influenza (H5N1)
As of January 24, 2009
Country Report dates this table

Total
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
cases deaths cases deaths cases deaths cases deaths cases deaths cases deaths cases deaths cases deaths
  Azerbaijan   8 5 63%   8 5 63%
  Bangladesh   1 0 0%   1 0 0%
  Cambodia   4 4 100% 2 2 100% 1 1 100% 1 0 0%   8 7 87%
  PR China 1 1 100%   8 5 63% 13 8 62% 5 3 60% 4 4 100% 3 2 67% 34 23 68%
  Djibouti   1 0 0%   1 0 0%
  Egypt   18 10 56% 25 9 36% 8 4 50% 1 0 0% 52 23 44%
  Indonesia   20 13 65% 55 45 82% 42 37 88% 24 20 83%   141 115 82%
  Iraq   3 2 67%   3 2 67%
  Laos   2 2 100%   2 2 100%
  Myanmar   1 0 0%   1 0 0%
  Nigeria   1 1 100%   1 1 100%
  Pakistan   3 1 33%   3 1 33%
  Thailand   17 12 71% 5 2 40% 3 3 100%   25 17 68%
  Turkey   12 4 33%   12 4 33%
  Vietnam 3 3 100% 29 20 69% 61 19 31%   8 5 63% 6 5 83%   107 52 48%
Total 4 4 100% 46 32 70% 98 43 44% 115 79 69% 88 59 67% 44 33 75% 4 2 50% 399 252 63%
Source: World Health Organization Communicable Disease Surveillance & Response (CSR)

ar:قالب:حالات أتش5إن1 es:Plantilla:H5N1 fr:Modèle:Cas de H5N1 hr:Predložak:Slučajevi H5N1 is:Snið:H5N1 ro:H5N1 cazuri sr:Шаблон:Случајеви Х5Н1 vi:Tiêu bản:Diễn biến H5N1


ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply