October 2018

edit

  You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{{1}}}]]. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:58, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LisaRichards8961 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, I made an edit to page and then I was accused of something called sock-puppetry? The reason that was given was that I quote "Used the Same edit as Mandolinryan" which apparently is a blocked user. Which Is not true because as stated in the "edit summary" I took out all of the users Biased and partial opinions and replaced them with facts. I even cited all sources that I used. Also as I stated I have been following the events on this thread and I liked that users set up in the article. So I amended it and replaced them with facts and cited it. If memory serves me correctly, I believe that the user that had me reported is also the one that blocked the person that I am be accused of being-I guess. Which My name is Lisa and not Ryan; if his name is part of that user. Anyways, it is clear that the user Zackmann is doing everything in his power to prevent anyone from editing that page. Which is not the foundation of Wikipedia. I would appreciate it if I could be unblocked and also if my edit could be re-implemented. It is entirely based on fact and I gave the sources to prove it.

LisaRichards8961 (talk) 17:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Lisa RichardsReply

Decline reason:

Are you telling us it's entirely a coincidence that this account and the other have been found to be technically indistinguishable? I'll add that your claim that you "took out all of the users Biased and partial opinions and replaced them with facts" is wrong. Huon (talk) 17:50, 26 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.