Liminzhong
A tag has been placed on Access — Eligible Load, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Spiesr (talk) 14:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Active Energy"
editA page you created, Active Energy, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:
- Author requests deletion, if requested in good faith, and provided the page's only substantial content was added by its author. If the author blanks the page, this can be taken as a deletion request.
As you created the page, and have removed all content from it, it is assumed that you wish for it to be deleted. If this is not the case, you should restore the previous content of the page
If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 14:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Economics Concept
edit A tag has been placed on Economics Concept requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dekisugi (talk) 15:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Accounted-For Deficiency"
editA page you created, Accounted-For Deficiency, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:
- No indication of importance/significance. An article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.
Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you J.delanoygabsadds 15:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Accounting Concept"
editA page you created, Accounting Concept, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:
- No context. Very short articles with little or no context for their statements.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you J.delanoygabsadds 15:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Good advice
editThe problem you're having is that Wikipedia is not a dictionary or glossary, so we don't need articles that are simple definitions of terms. We're an encyclopedia, so we need more fully developed articles. If there's enough to say about one of these terms to write two or three paragraphs, supported by multiple sources, then that's great, but if there's only one or two sentences to say about it, then you shouldn't create an article. Let me know if you have questions or problems. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Please stop
editWe really do need you to stop and learn more about Wikipedia before creating any more articles. You can do that on your own, or if it would help, we can block you. If you want to be blocked from editing so you can read a little more about Wikipedia, please signal your request by creating another short, dictionary-definition article. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Nakon 16:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Power System Economics
edit A tag has been placed on Power System Economics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 16:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Active Power
edit A tag has been placed on Active Power requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 16:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Active Energy
edit A tag has been placed on Active Energy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 16:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Userpage
editDont use your userpage as a redirect link. You appear to have a history of creating rapidly deleted pages; if you'd like any help or whatnot feel free to ask. Ironholds (talk) 16:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
May 2008
edit
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 16:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Power System Economics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. This anime's article creator is Yelyos. This one, on the other hand, was created by WhisperToMe. Sgt_Pikachu5 12:39, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Accounted-For Obligation
edit An article that you have been involved in editing, Accounted-For Obligation, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accounted-For Obligation. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JuJube (talk) 11:40, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problems
edit Hello. Concerning your contribution, Accounted-For Obligation, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.pjm.com/services/training/downloads/20050712-pjm-101-glossary.pdf. As a copyright violation, Accounted-For Obligation appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Accounted-For Obligation has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Accounted-For Obligation and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Accounted-For Obligation with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Accounted-For Obligation.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. StephenBuxton (talk) 11:45, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:ANI mention
editHello, Liminzhong. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ANI regarding Copyright Infrigment, and treating Wikipedia like a dictionary.. The discussion can be found under the topic Liminzhong (talk · contribs. Yours, --This anime's article creator is Yelyos. This one, on the other hand, was created by WhisperToMe. Sgt_Pikachu5 12:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
edit