July 2024

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Languages of South America, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walsh90210 (talk) 19:34, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on World language

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page World language, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on World language

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page World language, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:25, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit

  Hello! I'm The ed17. Your recent edit(s) to the page Languages of South America appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ed [talk] [OMT] 17:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Le Brésil contient 220,051,512 millions d'habitants CIA Government https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/brazil/ Comment peut-il avoir moins de locuteurs lusophones ? Le Brésil est composé à 99,5% de locuteurs lusophones, les autres États frontaliers ne sont pas complètement hispanophones, mais également locuteurs de langues indigènes, notamment le Paraguay, le Pérou, la Bolivie. Sans parler que 30% de la population uruguayenne parle portugais. Likemav647 (talk) 06:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I don't know why you are putting so much faith in population estimates from the CIA Factbook over the United Nations or language estimates from Ethnologue, both of which are more reliable. We can't engage in original research for the latter. For Languages of South America, it is additionally important to use the same source for all numbers so that we can be sure they have all been counted in the same way.
On a broader note, please do not continue to edit war on Brazil and Languages of South America. Should you continue, you will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ed [talk] [OMT] 14:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
La CIA est une source peu fiable, elle serait moins importance ? Vous doutez des chiffres de la CIA ? Seriez-vous complotiste ? Likemav647 (talk) 04:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
"Ethnologue" est plus fiable que la CIA ? Vous êtes incroyable, ne seriez-vous pas complotiste ? Peut-être douteriez-vous de la Shoah... Likemav647 (talk) 04:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, Wikipedia would value a reference source that explicitly focuses on the topic of languages over the general CIA Factbook. I did not say the latter was less reliable. WP:CONTEXTMATTERS 101.
Beyond that, I am absolutely flabbergasted that you'd compare this incredible minor debate to the Holocaust. I am not going to engage you any further, and you should know that if you persist on this road, you will be blocked from editing in short order. Ed [talk] [OMT] 23:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Je suis un Juif Portugais, ce que vous dites est effroyable ! Ma famille a fui le Brésil qui était autrefois une région portugaise. Nous étions 80 000, je vous demande de me pardonner d'être pointilleux en ce qui concerne les chiffres ! Je vous demande d'actualiser la page, nous sommes en 2024 et la CIA et d'autres source. Principalement la CIA qui est une source incontestable, atteste 220 millions de Brésiliens. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/brazil/ Page last updated: August 27, 2024 Likemav647 (talk) 17:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ainsi que https://www.census.gov/popclock/world
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=8c32c09b-3a50-47cf-86a6-c2975d7450d3 Likemav647 (talk) 17:33, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sources* Likemav647 (talk) 17:34, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply