Ligaisthebest

Welcome!

Hello, Ligaisthebest, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 00:16, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Football infobox

Please note that appearances and goals only account for those in the domestic league. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 08:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

FIFA 09

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DJDannyP//Talk2Me 00:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Football biographies

Hi, it is great to see someone improving Wikipedia's coverage of Ecuadorian football. Can I ask you to remember to always include at least one external link from a reliable source (National Football Teams is good for players at international level) when creating articles and please do not create interwiki links [[es:playername]] to articles that do not exist, otherwise keep up the good work. EP 23:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Juan Anangonó has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 00:42, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Erik de Jesús has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 19:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Erick de Jesús

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Erick de Jesús, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Erik de Jesús. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello, were you trying to move the article to a new title? If so, you need to use the move function so as to preserve the page history. If you ask me, I'll happily help to get the page moved correctly, if you think that the current title is incorrect. Best, – Toon^(talk) 23:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ligaisthebest! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 10 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 870 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Byron Camacho - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Jhon Minda - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Geovanny Nazareno - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Wilfrido Vinces - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Víctor Macías - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Polo Wila - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Gonzalo Chila - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Henry Pata - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Víctor Estupiñán - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Juan Kely Guerrón - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Henry Pata

The article Henry Pata has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unreferenced, and no assertion of meeting our basic standards for notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --WFC-- 22:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Twinkle should have done this automatically, but doesn't seem to have worked properly. I have nominated the article for a deletion discussion. Your thoughts are welcome. Regards, --WFC-- 23:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)