Liesbeth98
Thanks
editThanks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Neutralitytalk 21:28, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
March 2016
editPlease take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. — Diannaa (talk) 13:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Liesbeth98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The added text were all facts of events and I believe my block is political motivated. Furthermore, every added text was accompanied with the reference where it came fromLiesbeth98 (talk) 15:22, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are blocked for violating copyright policy; citing the source of your copyright violations does not change their nature; nor does asserting their truth. --jpgordon::==( o ) 16:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Liesbeth98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Like I said the sections that were added were facts like: X killed A because of reason C. There is nothing copyright on this issue, the whole news media is copying these kind of info from each other. Its not like the added text were from a book or published research Liesbeth98 (talk) 13:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Copyright does not only exist in books or published research, and you were clearly copying text from various sources in breach of copyright policy (and law). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:12, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Liesbeth98. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)