Liberal Britain

Speedy deletion nomination of Social Democratic Party (UK, 2014-present)

Hello Liberal Britain,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Social Democratic Party (UK, 2014-present) for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ueutyi (talk) 00:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

User:Ethan.A.Gray of Craiglea

Would you care to explain why you blanked the user page of a blocked user? Are you connected in any way? Bazj (talk) 00:20, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Just noticed your other article, Gibraltar Chronicle Weekly, names Ethan Gray as editor. I think that answers my question. Bazj (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

In terms of...?

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ethan.A.Gray of Craiglea, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Bazj (talk) 00:32, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Very well, I apologies for using multiple account and admit to the claims. I simply wished to contribute to Wikipedia, but after waiting a long time, no one was taking action to reopen and unblock my account. Thus I decided to create a new account. I ask you to be lenient and allow me to continue to contribute to this website. I will, however, continue to contribute to this site, whatever your judgement, by creating a new account (after a while) if mine is blocked for a long period of time, as I do not see Sock puppetry as negative in the context of having one previous account indefinitely blocked. Liberal Britain (talk) 00:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Your contributions under your self-granted "clean start" have been an attempt to wipe your past, a bit of advertising for your business, and a hoax article. There's no sign of any request from you to have the block lifted. You threaten continued sock puppetry. You're not really making a good case for leniency are you? Bazj (talk) 00:53, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

No, but this time I mean it and I have not 'self-granted' myself a clean start, I am awaiting you're response. I simply said that I would continue to input my knowledge into Wikipedia as a contributor to the website. User:Liberal Britain 00:57, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

• You may request an unblock on your user talk page using the template {{unblock}}. Since you've created multiple accounts, I suggest you wait six months and ask for the standard offer if you wish to come back as a constructive editor. Mkdw^talk 21:03, 21 December 2015 (UTC)