December 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 16:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Dear Wikipedia administrators,
I hope this message finds you well. My username on Wikipedia is LemorNa, and I am writing to appeal my block that was imposed today. I understand that Wikipedia has strict policies to maintain the quality and integrity of its content, and I deeply regret any actions that may have led to my block.
I have carefully reviewed the reasons for my block, and I would like to offer my sincere apologies for any violations of Wikipedia's policies. I understand that I might've crossed the borders with my Sandbox, and I acknowledge that it was an oversight on my part. I assure you that it was not intentional, and I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines moving forward.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LemorNa (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The reason why I was spending so much time on sandbox is cause It was said that sandbox is a place where you can mess and test new things - so I have spent the last hour experimenting with fonts and stuff related to text formatations including html code which in my opinion would help me become a better wikipedia editor. LemorNa (talk) 16:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Sandboxes are for testing, but that's all you have done. You created your account today, and in two hours you made 523 edits that made it past the filters(and it looks like a few hundred that didn't), an extremely rapid pace. I'm not sure what you were trying to accomplish, but now that your testing is completed, please tell us what contributions you intend to make towards building this encyclopedia of human knowledge. 331dot (talk) 17:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, not sure if this counts as a reply but mostly all my tests were intended to get new knowledge about what can I do with all coding knowledge to make pages look better. Personally I've lately became enthusiastic about Wikipedia and I've came across multiple horrible pages which either have no links or the right fonts. Yesterday I was searching information for a project of mine and I came across a page which was overlinked like crazy. I've thought a lot about starting editing in Wikipedia but I didn't take action so today I decided that I will start editing. In my opinion, I can help improve article current states and thats the whole reason why I decided to create an account today.

(I hope that you see this and it counts as a reply)

Sincerely, LemorNa.

Stop screwing up this page. You are not permitted to alter the declined unblock request above. You can make a new unblock request, or you can add comments below the declined request. Responding to your comment, how about some examples of "multiple horrible pages" and the page that was "overlinked like crazy"?--Bbb23 (talk) 18:22, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:50mMidas per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/50mMidas. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Spicy (talk) 10:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply