User talk:Legolas2186/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

"Single Ladies"

Yes, per Wikipedia:Record charts. Cheers, Legolas. --Efe (talk) 08:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Sure. Its done. --Efe (talk) 09:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot. I checked it. The single charted last year, and only achieved peak position this year. So I changed your edit. --Efe (talk) 09:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Always welcome. --Efe (talk) 09:35, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Multiple year charting

Sorry if I wasn't rapid enough. It's an issue I've never thought about, so it will take me a little while to form an opinion.—Kww(talk) 13:19, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Would be good. Please set up a discussion there. --Efe (talk) 08:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Protection

Most of the IP edits do not appear to be vandalism, and in fact you look like you're in the middle of a content dispute with one (that is a warning, by the way, the track listing does not qualify as vandalism and so you are subject to WP:3RR). You're welcome to make a request at WP:RFPP (which I would prefer you do in the future rather than contact me directly), but I have a feeling you'll get the same answer there. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 07:17, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

That doesn't entitle you to continually revert it. As things go, that's not the most crucial thing to have referenced. Yes, it'd be preferred, but it's not vandalism to have it in there while a source is found. Have you considered looking for one yourself? Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 07:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Then wait a day or two. There's no deadline, so don't worry about it for right now. If it was just released, then you're right, there should be some reliable sources in relatively short order. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 07:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Poker face

Hi Legolas. Good evening (Philippine time). I actually did not add that peak position. It was an IP. Now added. --Efe (talk) 11:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't have to say w******. You are always w******. Hehe. --Efe (talk) 11:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

IMO, the word really has no use. "as the appearance of Chace Crawford in the video is still a bit shaky" is your opinion. Its up to you if you add it back. Cheers. --Efe (talk) 10:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

W******. Regarding this, to benefit everybody, maybe you post in the project's talk page so that your edits will not be reverted. --Efe (talk) 10:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

re:Components

You can see more at Wikipedia talk:Record charts/U.S. Billboard chart inclusion and contribute to Billboard chart inclusion discussion there.

Delhi 6 music review

Your entry suggests that Wordpress is some music review site. Wordpress is just a blogging site where anybody can be a critic. Doesnt make sense to put them here. Hence I removed those sections. Already people have started making fun of these entries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.144.233.233 (talk) 13:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Hot 100 number-ones of 2009 (USA)

Thanks. I would love to. But, we'll wait until 2010 before we can edit the page like how 2008 list appears now. We go updating them every week because Billboard magazine publishes the chart every Thursday. I invite you to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Record Charts. There is a list of lists there that need attention. Happy working with you Legolas. --Efe (talk) 05:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

OK. --Efe (talk) 05:54, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Madonna single pages

There's actually no convention over which arrangement to prefer. What you see in the project page is not a suggested arrangement. As long as the succession of contents is logical, its fine. For me, all lists and tables should go after the prose, per MoS. I checked them. Seems fine. They're watchlisted actually. --Efe (talk) 12:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Yep. I do watch them. Not only GAs, but FAs. And FAs do follow the guideline. --Efe (talk) 12:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

I'll be out later. If IPs persist, try adding "WP:Record charts" to your edit summary so that they will know what they're doing is against the guideline. --Efe (talk) 12:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Its night already. Hehe. Good night, Legolas. --Efe (talk) 13:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

--Efe (talk) 13:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Edit war

Don't edit war over the image since, it's a pointless battle. — Realist² 14:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Record_Charts#List_of_number-one_hits_.28United_States.29

A concern has been raised on the project's talk page. Please have a look. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 11:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Just Dance charts!!!

Hello Mr. Legolas!! I just wondering why you deleted the "United World Chart" position I've added to Lady Gaga's single "Just Dance". It's just a question! I need to know, because it's official, the song is at number-one on that chart, and it's a very good accomplishment for an artist. Here's the link where you can prove it by yourself if you don't believe me!! [1] That's all, I'll be waiting your answer...(Charlie White (talk) 05:03, 23 January 2009 (UTC))

Oh really!! I didn't know it!! I'm sorry, but that will be a problem!!! I can't remember if I added that chart to other articles...well I'll try my best, thanks for that information!!! (Charlie White (talk) 05:10, 23 January 2009 (UTC))

GA

I would love too. But, like I have said to Realist, its too early. Maybe until the singles start to decline in charts and when there are no edit wars. --Efe (talk) 12:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

I'll try to review the history. I haven't seen it. Been busy yesterday and today. Exams. --Efe (talk) 12:44, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Im back. I have reviewed at least the recent edits of the page. It would be pointless to semi-protect the page because it involves registered users and I think one IP. The IP who has been removing the genre/source of the genre is 60.234.151.56, but the IP has a number of good contribs to the page. Seems like folks there are engaged in a minor war. Charmed has helped you revert them, but I would like to note that she has previous edit wars regarding genres (see Rihanna's single talk pages). The best way to resolved it is to call the attention of those who don't agree with the genre and have a discussion on the talk page. --Efe (talk) 12:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Cool. "They Don't Care About Us" is a GA nom (on hold). No major concerns actually but you maybe interested in reviewing it. --Efe (talk) 07:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Raaz1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Raaz1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

GaGa

How dare you attack me!!! I will report you and you will be blocked. Your right I did not have a soure but charmed36 source did not even work. I know the rules. SO\o before you add comments on my user talk, make sure in the right.Kind regards. Dance-pop (talk) 09:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

I do take things in good faith. Like I have said before I know the rules. But like I have said before you did not think to look at charmed36 source. not all things on wikipedia are sourced (If that were done their probably would not be many articles on wikipedia). I try to give the people the rigth information and source most things. You only looked at one side of the story(charmed36) and then I waas in the wrong. The only reason I did not discuss the genre change in the disscussion page is because people do not respond to that. So before you add comments on my user talk, make sure in the right. Kind regards. Dance-pop (talk) 03:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I did not say everyting is not sourced that what makes not a stub or start class. I think next time you should look at both side of the story before adding comments on user talk page. It makes people look bad when they are a bad adminstrator like you. Dance-pop (talk) 04:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

The same back to you. I know the rules and I follow it carefully. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dance-pop (talk • contribs) 04:29, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I do provide edit summaries if it's a small change I do not provide one. I will report you for constinuley threatning me without a valid reason. And by the way it is not the law to provide a edit summary nor the rules. Next time be sure your in the right, otherwise you look like a fool, which you are. kind regards. Dance-pop (talk) 04:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

I always assume good faith, I am civil and I am NOT a disrupt, I have NEVER abused another user. YOU have not assumed good faith, are not civil and continuley abuse me. DO NOT HOLD GRUDGES FROM PAST EDITS. Assume good faith. Kind regards. Dance-pop (talk) 04:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Actions will be formely taken against you if you do not follow rules, that is a warning not a therat. Always assume good faith. Kind regards. Dance-pop (talk) 04:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

You are being ignorant, arrogant and childish. I wil not get into consequences like you will be facing soon if you do not clean up your act Legalos. It is true that when I know I am right I will try to change things, no matter what, because I do it the right way (this may seem arrogant, but I am really angry, real angry). Always assume good faith at all times .Kind regards. Dance-pop (talk) 04:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Dance-pop, how you can you and Legolas understand each other when you don't provide edit summaries and discuss them fully at the talk page? --Efe (talk) 05:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Memyselfandimusicvideo.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Memyselfandimusicvideo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 20:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Memyselfandimusicvideo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Memyselfandimusicvideo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 21:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Its getting stricter everyday. That's why I failed to include an image for "Baby Boy"; it was removed during its FAC. --Efe (talk) 10:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I have removed it myself. Please read the summary. BTW, you can actually use non-video images for that section when, for example, a routine is being performed similar the one performed in the video. --Efe (talk) 11:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm afraid. Maybe you ask someone who is very into this kind of problems. I suggest the one who tagged the image to "Me, Myself". --Efe (talk) 11:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

RE: Raaz - The Mystery Continues

We'll see; to be honest I've never done a GA review before. In the interests of fairness there are a few older nominations that should really be looked at first. Regards. PC78 (talk) 11:23, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but I don't know of anyone offhand. You might be best asking at WT:FILM. Regards. PC78 (talk) 13:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

RE: Luck by Chance

I've only had a quick look at this article; generally it looks good, the only thing it really needs is a more detailed plot summary, so I think Start-Class is a fair assessment for now. When I get chance I'll have a proper read of it and maybe give it a copyedit for spelling and grammer, but you might want to think about opening a peer review. Regards. PC78 (talk) 01:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Love Game

Until its single status is confirmed, then we can be sure that it will neither be redirected nor deleted. --Efe (talk) 03:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Discussion at WikiProject Record Charts

Please see this discussion and provide your opinion on proposed page moves. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 01:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Edit summary

It looks like a few other administrators have already asked her the same; I'll keep an eye on it, but I'd rather not pile on since other people seem to be aware of the situation. Nothing yet requires administrative action. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 19:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Septimus Heap

I am reviewing your article, Septimus Heap for GA, and have left some initial comments Talk:Septimus Heap/GA1. Please feel free to contact me with comments or questions. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 20:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Luck by Chance

There's no need to be rude. I direct you, please, to WP:ETIQUETTE, which you are violating. Just because something is sourced does not make it notable, pertinent or encyclopedic. You are adding WP:FANCRUFT. Regardless, I respected the fact of citations, and I suppose you did not notice, but I kept them and simply moved them to the External links.

You cannot label as vandalism edits with which you don't agree. And it is bad form to threaten other editors, as you have both me and another in your edit summaries.

I left a good-faith note on the talk page suggesting we discuss your edits. I ask this again. In the meantime, you are exhibiting WP:OWN behavior, and if you'd like not to collaborate, I'd suggest we ask for admin mediation. What do you say? And. please, say it politely. There's no need for the hostile behavior you've been exhibiting. Thanks. -- 207.237.223.118 (talk) 14:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

ANI

Just FYI, the above IP editor started an ANI thread about you here. I've moved to have it closed as frivolous and irrelevant to that noticeboard. Politizer ^talk/_contribs 15:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't understand why are you removing the link for the Delhi 6 un-official website.Its been visited by 1000's of fans and we have almost 500 readers continuously following the blog for updates.Would you please explain me the reason ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.244.100.114 (talk) 16:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Lady GaGa

I know all of this, I will try to do it. Signing my name I do not have tome and I forget, anyone it still comes up. The ref thing, you can do that, okay. Dance-pop (talk) 03:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

This sources says she is a pianist. I have checked, I do not knoe what you are talking about. source-http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/bio/index.jsp?pid=1003999 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dance-pop (talk • contribs) 04:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

You are annoying me, and I am getting aggressive legalos, LEAVE ME ALONE, I follow the guildline, do not tell me what to do, if you want to clean up my sources then do so, however they are reliable. And just for you I am not going to sign this post. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dance-pop (talk • contribs) 04:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

You continue to ignore my posts. I have NEVER ever abused anyone on wikipedia, so drop it. Wikipeia can use multiple sources. Dance-pop (talk) 05:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Legolas, dance-pop needs constant guidance. He's a newbie. He's not a disrupt at all. Now, I'll repeat to him to add edit summaries. If he don't heed any of us, then we should take proper actions. And please leave refs unformatted. Some users don't want to do that because its a waste of time. As long as its reliable, its fine. --Efe (talk) 07:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

No, that's a wrong presumption. Just because you are not an administrator means you are not bound to be listened to. Its just that both of you are hot recently, and until now. I see what can I do when he replies back. --Efe (talk) 07:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

OK, I don't want a heated "debate" on my talk page. Now he's learning to add edit summaries. As of now, he's offline, I think. No edits so far. Until he replies back... or when "bizarre" behaviors pop out of my screen... --Efe (talk) 08:04, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:UmbrellaVideo.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:UmbrellaVideo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)