Lazeks042186

March 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Figure skating at the 2014 Winter Olympics, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 17:13, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 21:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ... discospinster _talk 22:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kim Yuna may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:34, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Kim Yuna page

Hi, before undoing my edit on the Kim Yuna page, please join the discussion on the talk page. Thanks, Kirin13 (talk) 17:50, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Section blanking on Figure skating at the 2014 Winter Olympics – Ladies' singles

I keep seeing you blank the "Support for the results" section on the Figure skating at the 2014 Winter Olympics – Ladies' singles. You can disagree with the opinion, but you must keep Wikipedia neutral. And that means both sides have to be presented in the most neutral way possible. Thanks, Kirin13 (talk) 17:57, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kim Yuna shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. TJRC (talk) 21:39, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  slakr^\ talk / 04:55, 23 March 2014 (UTC)