Lauravictoriaj
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edits you made to Nemesysco, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
A couple points to keep in mind:
- Wikipedia operates on consensus. The Nemesysco article is the product of extensive debate. If your changes to it have been reverted, you should come to the talk page to discuss them so we can figure out whether and how to incorporate them.
- Information you add to the Nemesysco page and any other should include references to reliable source.
- The Nemesysco page is closely monitored for alterations to its consensus-driven changes, and each edit to the Nemesysco page pushes it further up in Google's search algorithms.
2600:1702:16E1:68E0:6DFD:4FEB:1230:9CD1 (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nemesysco. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. In particular, please review the Wikipedia guidelines for ensuring that all new material is cited to a reliable source. Thanks! 96.11.238.86 (talk) 17:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nemesysco. Please stop adding uncited material. 98.160.76.178 (talk) 23:18, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Jean Baptiste Fort has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lacks notability. Borderline speedy deletion (for promotional language and for lack of notability), but in any case I can find no evidence that he is actually a notable photographer (minor, passing mentions) or entrepreneur (nothing at all about him).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 12:43, 17 June 2022 (UTC)