Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Griot edit

Hi LandonAdamScott, please can you desist from adding the user Copana2002 to the list of suspected socks, as this is clearly done as a knee jerk reaction in retaliation to them adding you. Please also see our advice for defending yourself against claims. Let me know if you have any questions. Regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 12:37, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


My additions are sincere, as I am suspicious of this user. Kindly do not knee-jerk presume bad faith.

I cannot add my comment on your talk page. My question is: How would you advise I respond to this nonsense? May I expect an apology? LandonAdamScott (talk) 12:43, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Intent to Clarify to User:Tim Song (which was, ironically, removed) edit

I am giving you seventy-two (72) hours from the time and date of this post to clarify how my comments and/or additions are "vindictive" or in "bad faith", after which time you will be in default. In the future, kindly address my comments rather than removing them. LandonAdamScott (talk) 12:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

LandonAdamScott (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

OMG! As far as you can get from WP:SOCK of User:Griot!!! edit

I oppose and revert User:Griot edits. We are NO WHERE NEAR THE SAME IP RANGE! Do you bother to Check User, or just go around blocking people who revert this vandalism? No wonder Wikipedia is dying. Blatant stupidity is a glaring liability. Thank you for the block. This site has become a terrible waste of time, space and energy. Twitter and Facebook hello. LandonAdamScott (talk) 13:16, 21 January 2010 (UTC)Reply