Lamedood2002
May 2017
edit
Hello, I'm RA0808. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jeffrey Hart— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA0808 talkcontribs 16:33, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Carlickers
editHello Lamedood2002,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Carlickers for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
May 2017
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Carlickers, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:39, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Carlickers, you may be blocked from editing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:46, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Carlickers. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:49, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
edit
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lamedood2002, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
May 2017
edit This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Carlickers, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. reddogsix (talk) 15:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:17, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Carlickers Drawing.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Uploaded for Carlickers. No other use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:18, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
